Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/815,830

LOW POWER READ CIRCUIT FOR MULTI-BANK MEMORY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Examiner
HIDALGO, FERNANDO N
Art Unit
2827
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
1128 granted / 1209 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1227
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1209 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Examiner’s Note The examiner has cited particular passages including column and line numbers, paragraphs as designated numerically and/or figures as designated numerically in the references as applied to the claims below for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claims, other passages, paragraphs and figures of any and all cited prior art references may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant, in preparing an eventual response, to fully consider the context of the passages, paragraphs and figures as taught by the prior art and/or cited by the examiner while including in such consideration the cited prior art references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention. MPEP 2141.02 VI: “PRIOR ART MUST BE CONSIDERED IN ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING DISCLOSURES THAT TEACH AWAY FROM THE CLAIMS." MPEP 2123 (I): “PATENTS ARE RELEVANT AS PRIOR ART FOR ALL THEY CONTAIN.” Additionally, in an effort to provide a timely Office response to amendments the Applicant may file in response to this Office Action, it is respectfully requested that, on accompanying remarks/arguments papers, every effort be made to provide specific (page No., paragraph No., FIG. No., etc.) Specification/Drawings support for such amendments, particularly claim amendments. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for, in brief and saliently: a pair of far banks coupled to a first pair of local bitlines, a pair of near banks coupled to a second pair of local bitlines, a far global bit line coupled to the first pair of local bitlines, does not reasonably provide enablement for “a first NAND gate having a first input coupled to the second pair of local bitlines and a second input coupled to the far global bit line; a near global bit line coupled to the output of the first NAND gate.” The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. FIG. 3 of the drawings and [0020] in the specification seem relevant. [0020] discloses “The multi-bank SRAM 300 further comprises a NOR gate 380 having a first input coupled to the output of the near bank NAND gate 360, a second input coupled to the far global bitline, and an output which couples the near global bit line to the global I/O circuit 370.” At least [0020] of the specification and FIG. 3 clearly define the meaning of “coupled.” In the context of the specification, as set forth in at least [0020] and FIG. 3, “coupled” is defined as directly connected. An input of 380 is coupled (directly connected) to the output of NAND gate 360, and a second input of 380 coupled (directly connected) to the far global bitline (GBL Far). It is not apparent from the disclosure as set forth in the specification and drawings that, as claimed, “a first NAND gate having a first input coupled to the second pair of local bitlines and a second input coupled to the far global bit line.” The claimed second pair of local bitlines, as the claim requires, is found in the “Near Bank” 350 in FIG. 3. This second pair of local bitlines are the inputs to NAND gate 360. And the output of NAND gate 360 is coupled (directly connected) to an input of NOR gate 380. This analysis is in agreement with the disclosure in at least [0020] of the specification. Moreover, the claim limitation of “a near global bit line coupled to the output of the first NAND gate,” is also in complete disagreement with the disclosure as set forth in at least [0020] of the specification and FIG. 3 of the drawings. In fact, near global bitline (GBL Near) is coupled (directly connected) to the output of NOR gate 380. It is, therefore, unambiguously clear that what is claimed in claim 1 is in disagreement with the disclosure as set forth in at least [0020] of the specification and FIG. 3 of the drawings. Claim(s) 2-7 depend from claim 1, and as such are also rejected for at least the same reasons. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20200402575. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FERNANDO N HIDALGO whose telephone number is (571)270-3306. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-7:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 5712721852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. FERNANDO N. HIDALGO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2827 /Fernando Hidalgo/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602162
MEMORY TRAINING ENHANCEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604485
CROSS POINT ARRAY ARCHITECTURE FOR MULTIPLE DECKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603134
NOR Memory Cell with Floating Gate
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597448
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588182
MULTI-PORT SRAM CELL WITH METAL INTERCONNECT STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+1.4%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1209 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month