Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/818,017

LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 28, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0144794 +1 more
Examiner
YEMELYANOV, DMITRIY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
425 granted / 572 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
611
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 572 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al. (US 2017/0237234 A1) in view of Torvik (“III-Nitride Semiconductors: Electrical, Structural and Defects Properties” 2000, Pages 17-49, Chapter 2). Regarding Claim 1, Han (Fig. 5) discloses a method of manufacturing a light emitting element comprising: preparing a stacked substrate; disposing a 1-1-th semiconductor layer (510, 515, 560) including a first type of semiconductor “silicon-doped gallium nitride 515; n-type gallium-nitride layer 560) [0053, 0055, 0065] on the stacked substrate; disposing an intermediate layer (530, 535) on the 1-1-th semiconductor layer; disposing a 1-2-th semiconductor layer (560) including the first type of semiconductor (“n-type gallium-nitride layer 560” [0065]) on the intermediate layer; disposing an active layer (565) on the 1-2-th semiconductor layer (560); disposing a second semiconductor layer (570) including a second type of semiconductor (“a p-type gallium-nitride layer 570) [0065] different from the first type on the active layer (565); removing at least a portion of each of the 1-1-th semiconductor layer (510, 515, 560), the intermediate layer (530, 535), the 1-2-th semiconductor layer, the active layer 565), and the second semiconductor layer (570) in a direction from the second semiconductor layer toward the 1-2-th semiconductor layer (560); [0065] and performing an electrochemical etching process on the intermediate layer (530, 535) [0062] to form a porous structure (“the EC etching converts the heavily doped gallium-nitride layers 535 to porous gallium-nitride layers 550”) in the intermediate layer (530, 535). [0062]. Han does not explicitly disclose a 1-2-th semiconductor layer is doped with first type conductivity type dopant. However, Han discloses that a 1-1-th semiconductor layer (510, 515) doped with the first type conductivity type dopant (“a conductive layer 515 formed of silicon-doped gallium nitride”). [0053] Examiner notes that there is limited amount of n-type conductivity dopants (Ex. Si, Ge, Sn) for GaN Torvik discloses disclosing Si as one of the preferred n-type dopant for GaN material among limited amount of doping materials (“Several column IV elements such as Si, Ge, Sn have been investigated as candidates for n-type doping of GaN” (4.1.2. Si-doping 4.2.2. Si-doping (“Silicon is the n-type dopant of choice for GaN since it effectively incorporates on the gallium site and forms a single shallow donor level.”) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify a light emitting element in Han in view of Torvik such that a 1-2-th semiconductor layer is doped with the first type conductivity type dopant since that the selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use supported a prima facie obviousness determination in Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 USPQ 297 (1945) (See MPEP 2144.07) and in order to effectively incorporates on the gallium site and forms a single shallow donor level. (Torvik) Regarding Claim 2, Han (Fig. 5) in view of Torvik discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the disposing of the intermediate layer (535, 530) includes: disposing a first doped layer doped with a dopant having a first concentration (“heavily-doped gallium-nitride layers of 535”); and disposing a second doped layer doped with a dopant having a second concentration less than the first concentration. (“moderately-doped gallium-nitride layers 530”) [0054] Regarding Claim 3, Han (Fig. 5) in view of Torvik discloses the method of claim 2, wherein the first doped layer (535) has a first thickness (T1) that satisfies Equation 1, and the second doped layer (530) has a second thickness (T2) [0057, 0059] Han in view of Torvik does not explicitly disclose that the first doped layer (535) has a first thickness (T1) that satisfies Equation 1, and the second doped layer (530) has a second thickness (T2) that satisfies Equation 2, wherein Equation 1 is defined as follows: PNG media_image1.png 58 73 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein n1 is a refractive index of the first doped layer, λ is a wavelength [nm] of light emitted from the active layer, m=2h1−1, and h1 is an integer greater than or equal to 1, and Equation 2 is defined as follows : PNG media_image2.png 57 73 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein n2 is a refractive index of the second doped layer, λ is the wavelength [nm] of the light emitted from the active layer, m=2h2−1, and h2 is an integer greater than or equal to 1. However, Han disclosing varying thicknesses for the first doped layer (535) has a and the second doped layer (530) [0056-0059]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the light emitting element in Han in view of Torvik such that the first doped layer (535) has a first thickness (T1) that satisfies Equation 1, and the second doped layer (530) has a second thickness (T2) that satisfies Equation 2, wherein Equation 1 is defined as follows: PNG media_image1.png 58 73 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein n1 is a refractive index of the first doped layer, λ is a wavelength [nm] of light emitted from the active layer, m=2h1−1, and h1 is an integer greater than or equal to 1, and Equation 2 is defined as follows : PNG media_image2.png 57 73 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein n2 is a refractive index of the second doped layer, λ is the wavelength [nm] of the light emitted from the active layer, m=2h2−1, and h2 is an integer greater than or equal to 1 since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 276 (CCPA 1980) and to have DBR that correspond to approximately ¼ wavelength of the VCSEL's designed operating wavelength [0057, 0058] Regarding Claim 4, Han (Fig. 5) in view of Torvik discloses the method of claim 2, wherein the first doped layer and the second doped layer are formed by epitaxial growth. [0055] Regarding Claim 5, Han (Fig. 5) in view of Torvik discloses the method of claim 2, wherein the electrochemical etching process is performed through the side surface of the intermediate layer and is selectively performed on the first doped layer. [“lateral etching”, 0046, 0062] Regarding Claim 6, Han (Fig. 5) in view of Torvik discloses the method of claim 1, wherein a thickness of the intermediate layer (530, 535) is in a range. Han in view of Torvik does not explicitly disclose a thickness of the intermediate layer is in a range of about 1 μm to about 2 μm. However, Han discloses varying thickness of the intermediate layer (530, 535) based on a desired VCSEL's designed operating wavelength, having thickness of each layer 530 between approximately 40 nm and approximately 60 nm or an odd number multiple thereof and thickness of each layer 535 the thicknesses t.sub.2 of the heavily-doped gallium-nitride layers 535 may be selected such that after being etched to form porous layers, the resulting thickness of each layer corresponds to approximately ¼ wavelength (or an odd-number multiple thereof) of the VCSEL's designed lasing wavelength [0056-0059] and further discloses there may be 6 to 20 layer pairs of undoped or moderately-doped and heavily-doped gallium-nitride layers in a DBR structure [0054] Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the light emitting element in Han in view of Torvik such that a thickness of the intermediate layer is in a range of about 1 μm to about 2 μm in order to have DBR thickness that correspond to approximately ¼ wavelength of the VCSEL's designed operating wavelength [0057, 0058] and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 276 (CCPA 1980) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Han et al. (US 20160197151 A1) and Wu et al. (US 20140167097 A1) and Kim (US 20170005242 A1) discloses vertical etching of LED and lateral porosification gallium-nitride layer by electrochemical etching Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DMITRIY YEMELYANOV whose telephone number is (571)270-7920. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9a.m.-6p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Landau can be reached at (571) 272-1731. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DMITRIY YEMELYANOV/Examiner, Art Unit 2891
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727297
ARRAY OF LIGHT EMITTING DEVICES WITH REDUCED OPTICAL CROSSTALK
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713977
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12707763
LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707711
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH CMOS INVERTER
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707699
Semiconductor Device Structure
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 572 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month