Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/857,016

FILM-FORMING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE-PROCESSING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Examiner
TADAYYON ESLAMI, TABASSOM
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Tokyo Electron Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
384 granted / 776 resolved
-15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
65 currently pending
Career history
841
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim 11 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 01/26/26. Applicant’s election without traverse of group I in the reply filed on 01/26/26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5-7, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shuji Shinonome et al (Japanese Patent: 2021125607, here after 607). Claim 1 is rejected. 607 teaches a film forming method, comprising: preparing a substrate (15) having a metal film (11) formed on a surface of a first area and a first insulating film (12) formed on a surface of a second area [fig. 2B, page 4 lines 3-6, page 3 last three paragraphs]; forming a self-assembled monolayer (13) of an organic compound in the first area [fig. 2C, page 4 lines 24-26] by supplying, to a surface of the substrate, a gas containing the organic compound having a chain portion [CH3(CH2) x CH2SH, x = 1 ~ 18, page 4 lines 27-29], a first functional group provided at one end of the chain portion, and a second functional group provided at a remaining end of the chain portion[page 4 last 2 paragraphs]; forming a second insulating film in the second area by supplying a precursor gas and a reaction gas to the surface of the substrate [page 5, paragraphs 2-3, paragraph 5-6]; and removing the self-assembled monolayer formed in the first area [page 5 paragraph 4]. Claim 3 is rejected. 607 teaches the first functional group includes thiol [page 4 lines 27-29]. Claim 5 is rejected as the second functional group includes from a group consisting of thiol [page 4 lines 27-29]. Claim 6 is rejected. 607 teaches the precursor gas includes trimethyl aluminum, trialkyl aluminum [page 5 paragraph 6]. Claim 7 is rejected. 607 teaches the chain portion is an alkyl chain, and a number of carbon atoms in the alkyl chain is less than 30 [page 4 lines 27-29]. Claim 10 is rejected. 607 teaches the processing is performed on a plurality of substrates in parallel to complete the selective film formation processing of a predetermined number of substrates [page 10 lines 13-14], therefor the forming the self-assembled monolayer in the first area, the forming the second insulating film in the second area, and the removing the self-assembled monolayer formed in the first area are repeated. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shuji Shinonome et al (Japanese Patent: 2021125607, here after 607). Claim 8 is rejected for the same reason claim 7 is rejected above. Although 607 does not teach the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl chain is 10 or less, however teaches the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl chain is 1-18. Overlapping ranges are prima facie evidence of obviousness. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to have selected the portion of [overlapping range] that corresponds to the claimed range. In re Malagari, 182 USPQ 549 (CCPA 1974). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a method of 607 where the carbon atoms in the alkyl chain is 10 or less, because an ordinary skill in the art can select the portion of overlapping range that corresponds to the claimed range in absence of criticality. Claims 2, 4, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shuji Shinonome et al (Japanese Patent: 2021125607, here after 607), further in view of Yoshinori Nakano et al (Japanese Patent: 2005053116, here after 116). Claim 2 is rejected, the first functional group(thiol) is a functional group which selectively adsorbs to the metal film, but 607 does not teach the second functional selectively adsorbs to the precursor gas. 116 teaches a method of depositing self-assembled monolayer on metal surface, where it comprising COOH(CH2) n SH, wherein n is 3-30(organic compound having a chain portion) [abstract]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a method of 607, where self-assembly layer comprising COOH(CH2) n SH, because it can be substitute as self -assembly monolayer on metal surface for 607 with expectation of success. Claim 4 is rejected for the same reason claim 2 is rejected above.116 teaches the second functional group includes carboxylic acid. Claim 9 is rejected for the same reason claim 2 is rejected above. 607 teaches forming the second insulating film in the second area includes repeating (ALD) a cycle including supplying the precursor gas (TMA) to the surface of the substrate such that the precursor gas is adsorbed to a surface of the first insulating film in the second area and supplying the reaction gas to the surface of the substrate such that the reaction gas reacts with the precursor gas [page 5 paragraph 6, page 6 paragraph 7]. 607 and 116 both teach thiol functional group adsorb on surface of metal, and carboxylic acid functional group of 116 as the second function group adsorb on a surface of the self-assembled monolayer in the first area, where adsorb the precursor gas (TMA). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-1885. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached at 5712725166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1718
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599968
METHOD OF PRODUCING AN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600634
2D AMORPHOUS CARBON FILM ASSEMBLED FROM GRAPHENE QUANTUM DOTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601049
AG- AND/OR CU- CONTAINING HARD COATINGS WITH ANTIBACTERIAL, ANTIVIRAL AND ANTIFUNGAL PROPERTIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590372
LASER INDUCED FORWARD TRANSFER OF 2D MATERIALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585183
METHOD OF FORMING AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE ON A FLEXIBLE SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+27.1%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month