Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/943,785

TARGET-ASSOCIATED MOLECULES FOR CHARACTERIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH BIOLOGICAL TARGETS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 11, 2024
Priority
Aug 04, 2017 — provisional 62/541,555 +2 more
Examiner
VANORE, DAVID A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Billiontoone Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1128 granted / 1269 resolved
+28.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1287
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§103
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1269 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 29 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The term “next-generation sequencing” is not described or supported in the disclosure. Claim 29 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for sequencing of a DNA sample, does not reasonably provide enablement for all uses of next-generation sequencing. The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make or use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. The disclosure does not recite all possible acts for next-generation sequencing, which is the breadth of a general claim to the use of next-generation sequencing as claimed. Nor does the disclosure define “next-generation sequencing”. Therefore, the scope of the claim exceeds the disclosure. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 29 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 29 includes the term “next-generation sequencing” which is not defined in the disclosure. It is not clear what the term includes and excludes. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 23-28 and 30-42 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art fails to teach or suggest A method for determining an abundance characterization of a biological sample, the method comprising: generating a set of target-associated molecules comprising: target-associated regions with sequence similarity to a target sequence region of a biological target; and target variation regions with sequence dissimilarity to a sequence region of the biological target; forming a mixture including the target-associated molecules and DNA from the biological sample; dividing the mixture into a first portion and a second portion; amplifying the first portion of the mixture; amplifying the second portion of the mixture; and determining the abundance characterization of the biological target based on amplicons of the first portion of the mixture and amplicons of the second portion of the mixture as recited in claim 23. Claims 24-28 and 30-42 are allowable by virtue of their dependency. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID A VANORE whose telephone number is (571)272-2483. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 7AM to 6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia EPPS can be reached at (571) 272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID A VANORE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 11, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749208
ELECTRON BEAM SPOT SHAPE RECONSTRUCTION UNIT
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749646
MULTIPOLE ELEMENTS AND CHARGED PARTICLE MICROSCOPE SYSTEMS INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12731775
METHOD OF OPTIMIZING GEOMETRIC AND ELECTROSTATIC PARAMETERS OF AN ELECTROSTATIC LINEAR ION TRAP (ELIT)
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730127
ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE (AFM) DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725755
SAMPLE PIECE RELOCATING DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.5%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1269 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month