Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/972,428

Measurements Of Complex Semiconductor Structures Based On Component Measurement Signals

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Dec 15, 2023 — provisional 63/610,426 +1 more
Examiner
HANSEN, JONATHAN M
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
KLA Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
606 granted / 763 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
797
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 763 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by US Publication 2022/0090912 to Sanko et al. In regards to claims 1-20, Sanko discloses and shows in Figures 1-3, a metrology system and method (par. 3) comprising: an illumination source (102) configured to generate a beam of radiation incident on a semiconductor structure (101) disposed on a semiconductor wafer under measurement, the semiconductor structure under measurement including a plurality of structural features (Figure 1) (par. 43-44); a detector (104) configured to detect radiation from the semiconductor structure under measurement in response to the incident beam of radiation and generate a set of actual measurement signals indicative of the detected radiation (par. 43-44); and a computing system (130) (par. 45-46, 108, 112-113) configured to: estimate a first value of a parameter of interest characterizing the structure under measurement based on the detected radiation (par. 4, 7-8, 12), wherein the estimating of the value of the parameter of interest involves a trained measurement model of the structure under measurement (par. 4, 7-9, 22, 36, 38), the measurement model trained based at least in part on a training set of component measurement signals and corresponding Design Of Experiment (DOE) values of the parameter of interest (par. 9, 11, 40, 47, 50, 63), wherein the training set of component measurement signals is indicative of a measurement response of a subset of the plurality of structural features of the semiconductor structure to measurement by the metrology system (par. 23, 47, 49, 62; wherein a subset of the training data may be comprised of the measured and/or simulated data from a particular target from a plurality of targets on a wafer); [claims 2 and 13] wherein the estimating of the value of the parameter of interest involves: extracting a set of component measurement signals from the set of actual measurement signals (par. 7, 9, 11, 16, 22-23, 36, 47, 49, 62-63; wherein a plurality of physical and machine learning models are generated by iteratively adjusting one or more machine or specimen parameters); and fitting the trained measurement model to the set of component measurement signals (par. 7, 11, 19, 53; wherein training data and measurement data are compared to determine a quality metric); [claim 3] wherein the training set of component measurement signals includes component measurement signals extracted from a training set of measurement signals indicative of a measured response of the plurality of structural features of the semiconductor structure to measurement by the metrology system (par. 16, 19, 22-23, 36, 47, 62; wherein the training data includes measurement data, simulated data, or both); [claim 4 and 14] wherein the training set of component measurement signals includes synthetic component measurement signals generated by a component measurement model evaluated at a range of values of the parameter of interest and a range of values of one or more measurement system parameters (par. 7, 11, 16, 19, 22-23, 36, 47, 62; wherein the training data includes measurement data, simulated data, or both; and wherein a plurality of physical and machine learning models are generated by iteratively adjusting one or more machine or specimen parameters); [claim 5 and 15] wherein the training set of component measurement signals includes component measurement signals generated by a measurement of the semiconductor structure at a prior process state, wherein the subset of the plurality of structural features of the semiconductor structure are present at the prior process state (par. 7, 23, 49, 107; wherein a library of various parameter models may be searched; and training or measurement data may be collected from multiple different metrology systems); [claim 6] the measurement model also trained based at least in part on a training set of measurement signals and corresponding Design of Experiment (DOE) values of the parameter of interest, wherein the training set of measurement signals are indicative of a measurement response of the plurality of structural features of the semiconductor structure to measurement by the metrology system (par. 9, 11, 40, 47, 50, 63); [claim 7 and 16] the measurement model also trained based at least in part on a training set of historical component measurement signals, wherein the historical component measurement signals are indicative of a measurement response of a historical version of the subset of the plurality of structural features of the semiconductor structure to measurement by the metrology system (par. 7, 23, 49, 107; wherein a library of various parameter models may be searched; and training or measurement data may be collected from multiple different metrology systems) (par. 9, 11, 40, 47, 50, 63; wherein previously obtained reference data and reference models, having known DOE values, may be utilized); [claim 8] wherein the historical version of the subset of the plurality of structural features of the semiconductor structure differs from the subset of the plurality of structural features of the semiconductor structure in a design revision, a process recipe, or both (par. 25-27, 40, 42; wherein an active feedback process may be performed to determine necessary changes in process parameters or recipe); [claim 9 and 17] wherein the trained measurement model is a machine learning based measurement model or a library-based measurement model (par. 4, 7-8, 12); [claim 10 and 18] the computing system further configured to: estimate a second value of the parameter of interest characterizing the structure under measurement, wherein the estimating of the second value of the parameter of interest involves fitting a second measurement model to the set of actual measurement signals, wherein the first value of the parameter of interest is employed as a seed value in the fitting of the second measurement model to the set of actual measurement signals (par. 7, 11, 16, 19, 22-23, 36, 47, 62; wherein the training data includes measurement data, simulated data, or both; and wherein a plurality of physical and machine learning models are generated by iteratively adjusting one or more machine or specimen parameters; and wherein the generated models are iteratively compared to measurement data to determine a quality metric model and optimize semiconductor manufacturing); [claim 11 and 19] wherein the amount of radiation includes electron radiation, electromagnetic radiation in an x-ray range, electromagnetic radiation in an optical range, or any combination thereof (par. 3, 43). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN M HANSEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1736. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 8am to 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michelle Iacoletti can be reached at 571-270-5789. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JONATHAN M. HANSEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2877 /JONATHAN M HANSEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2877
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698959
ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT METHOD FOR THE PHASE OF THE COMPLEX COHERENCE COEFFICIENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693472
TECHNIQUES FOR INCREASING A QUALITY FACTOR OF AN OPTICAL FILTER WITHOUT SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASING FILTER SIZE AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12665665
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INSPECTING A FIBERED OPTICAL PATH
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663266
PHASE MODULATION SIGNAL GENERATING DEVICE FOR FIBER-OPTIC GYROSCOPE
1y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656594
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CALCULATING AND MAINTAINING AN OPTIMAL SAMPLE POSITION IN AN INTERFEROMETRIC MICROSCOPE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 5m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 763 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month