Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/980,698

LOAD REDUCED MEMORY MODULE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 13, 2024
Priority
Oct 15, 2013 — provisional 61/891,331 +7 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, VIET Q
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Rambus Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allowance Rate
1197 granted / 1259 resolved
+35.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1273
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§102
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1259 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. Claims 2-21 are present for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 2. Claims 2-3, 5, 11, 14 & 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vogt (US 2004/0246786). Claim 2, Vogt (Fig. 3-6) clearly shows a plurality of memory module (DRAM 58 modules), each module has a plurality of integrated DRAM chips (or array) in same module (see Fig. 6), and Fig. 6 also shows each DRAM module 58 has two side ports (on left & right sides) for transferring data between different but adjacent DRAM modules and host/CPU, and that a common data path (or bus 54 & 56) is shown coupled to the first port (on left side) of each respective DRAM module and also coupled to its second port (on right side) so that any data can be forwarded (back & forth) from the host 50 to the first port and also forwarding to the second port (on right side) based on the control signal (from CLK buffer 78) as claimed. Note that the common data path (54) has 2 lines and is split by the first DRAM module into a first set of data lines (54 on left side of each module) and a second set of data lines (54 on right side of each module) as well. Claim 3, the CLK buffer is a type of “register” for holding a clock signal (CLK) as controlling pulse for activating the data transfer between multiple/parallel DRAM modules as see in Fig. 6. Claim 5 & 14, the first set of data lines 54 (on left side of the first DRAM module) is use to receive data from the external host/CPU 50, and the second set of data lines 54 (on right side of the first module) is used to transmit data from the first module 58 to the second/adjacent module 58 is seen in Fig. 6. Claim 11, Figs. 1 & 6 show DRAM configurations wherein each DRAM module can have multiple DRAM chips stacked upon each other to minimize space, and thus the configuration of stacked dies are considered as optional design choices and//or well-known knowledge to a skilled person in this art as well. Claim 20, Fig. 3 shows the memory controller 50 coupled to all these cascaded DRAM modules by the common bus (54 & 56), and this is considered a conventional knowledge that the controller 50 uses both address & data to select and access to each/particular module (in the cascaded chain) as also well-known in this art. See Fig. 6 below: [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Second port)][AltContent: textbox (First port)] [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (First & second data lines 54/56)] PNG media_image1.png 630 912 media_image1.png Greyscale 3. Claims 2, 5, 11, 14 & 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mooney et al (US 2005/0146980). Claim 2, Mooney (Fig. 6-8) clearly shows a plurality of memory module (DRAM modules 1-4, see Fig. 8), each module can store a plurality of integrated DRAM chips (or array M11 to M44, etc.), and Fig. 6 also shows each DRAM module 58 has two side ports (on left & right sides) for transferring data between adjacent DRAM modules and host/cpu, and that a common data path (see left & right arrows) is shown coupled to the first port (on left side) of each respective DRAM module and also coupled to its second port (on right side) so that any data can be forwarded (back & forth) from the host/controller to the first port and also forwarding to the second port (on right side) based on the control signals (or data strobes & clock signals, etc.) as claimed. Note that the common data path has 2 lines and is split by the first DRAM module into a first set of data lines (see lines 58 on left side of each module) and a second set of data lines (see lines 70-on right side of each module) as well. Claim 5 & 14, the first set of data lines 50/56 (on left side of the first DRAM module) is use to receive data from the external host/CPU, if any, and the second set of data lines 70/76 (on right side of the first module) is used to transmit data from the first module (see Module 1, Fig. 8 as example) to the second/adjacent module (or Module 2) as shown in Fig. 8. Claim 11, Figs. 8-9 show DRAM configurations wherein each DRAM module can have multiple DRAM chips stacked upon each other to minimize space, and thus the configuration of stacked dies are considered as optional design choices and//or well-known knowledge to a skilled person in this art as well. Claim 20, Figs. 6-9 shows that the memory controller is coupled to all these cascaded DRAM modules by the common bus between them, and this is considered a conventional knowledge that the controller uses both address & data to select and access to each/particular module (in the cascaded chain) as also well-known in this art.. See Fig. 8 illustration below: [AltContent: textbox (First & second data lines = 50/56 & 70/76)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Second port)][AltContent: textbox (First port)] PNG media_image2.png 528 620 media_image2.png Greyscale 4. Claims 2, 5, 14 & 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ross (US 2020/0097207). Claim 2, Ross (Fig. 2) clearly shows a plurality of memory module (stacked DRAM 221-1 to 221-15 cell device), each device has its own cell array with two side data ports (see 222-1 & 222-2 as example), and Fig. 2 further shows each DRAM device 221 as two side ports (on left & right sides) for transferring data between DRAM devices and controllers, and that a common data path (or bus 212 & 213) is shown coupled to the first port (on left side) of each respective DRAM device and also coupled to its second port (on right side) so that any data can be forwarded (back & forth) from the host 202 to the first port and also forwarding to the second port (on right side) based on the control signal (from controller/host) as claimed. For example, Fig. 2shows the common data path has 2 sets of data lines and is split by the first DRAM device (221-1) into a first set of data lines (212-1) on left side and a second set of data lines (213-1) on right side of device 221-1) as seen. Claim 5 & 14, the first set of data lines 212 (on left side of each DRAM device) is use to receive data from the external host/CPU 202, and the second set of data lines 213 (see right side of the first device 221-1) is used to transmit data from the first device 221-1 to the second/below device 221-3 is seen in Fig. 6. Claim 20, Fig. 3 shows the memory controller coupled to all these cascaded DRAM modules by the two-way, common bus between them, and this is considered a conventional knowledge that the controller uses both address & data to select and access to each/particular module (in the cascaded chain) as also well-known in this art. Allowable Subject Matter 5. The remaining claims 4, 6-10, 12-13, 15-19 & 21 are objected as being depend upon their respective rejected/parent claims above, but they tentatively contain additional/allowable subject matter over the prior arts, which are not seen elsewhere at this time. 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VIET Q NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1788. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-3PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 571-272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VIET Q NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12694925
STORAGE DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685197
CHIP SELECT WIRING FOR A DUAL DEVICE PACKAGE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685124
MEMORY ARRAY CIRCUIT
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682945
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR SINGLE AND MULTI MEMORY CELL ARCHITECTURES
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676186
MEMORY DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+3.5%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1259 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month