Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/013,048

Bowed Substrate Clamping Method, Apparatus, and System

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
Nov 10, 2022 — continuation of 12/224,192
Examiner
PATEL, DHARTI HARIDAS
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Applied Materials Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1111 granted / 1272 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1295
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1272 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A non-statutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on non-statutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a non-statutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-2, 7, 11-13 are rejected on the ground of non-statutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-2, 5, 8-9 and 12 of U.S. Patent No.12,224,192. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Instant Application Claims US Patent : 12,224,192 A method for clamping a substrate comprising: i.placing a substrate on a clamping surface of a substrate support having a plurality of electrodes spaced from one another including a first electrode and a second electrode; ii.measuring substrate bow of the substrate; iii.determining, based on the measured substrate bow, a first voltage to be applied to the first electrode and a second voltage to be applied to the second electrode; iv.applying the first voltage to the first electrode and the second voltage to the second electrode to clamp the substrate to the substrate support; and repeating ii, iii, and iv until substrate bow of the substrate is determined to be optimized based on at least one of variation in clamp pressure or heat transfer flux. 1. A method for clamping a substrate, comprising, i. placing a substrate on a clamping surface of a substrate support having a plurality of electrodes spaced from one another including a first electrode and a second electrode; ii. measuring substrate bow of the substrate; iii. determining, based on the measured substrate bow, a first voltage to be applied to the first electrode and a second voltage to be applied to the second electrode, wherein the first voltage is an AC voltage, and the second voltage is an AC or a DC voltage; iv. applying the first voltage to the first electrode and the second voltage to the second electrode to clamp the substrate to the substrate support; and repeating ii, iii, and iv until substrate bow of the substrate is determined to be optimized, wherein the substrate bow of the substrate is determined to be optimized when at least one of variation in clamp pressure or heat transfer flux are minimized. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying a coating to the substrate while the substrate is clamped to the substrate support. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying a non-uniform coating to the substrate while the substrate is clamped to the substrate support. 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: discontinuing applying the first voltage to the first electrode and the second voltage to the second electrode; transferring the clamped substrate and substrate support together to a processing chamber having an electrostatic chuck and electrostatically coupling the substrate support to the electrostatic chuck; and after transferring, applying a third voltage to the first electrode and a fourth voltage to the second electrode. 5.The method of claim 1, further comprising: discontinuing applying the first voltage to the first electrode and the second voltage to the second electrode; transferring the clamped substrate and substrate support together to a processing chamber having an electrostatic chuck and electrostatically coupling the substrate support to the electrostatic chuck; and after transferring, applying a third voltage to the first electrode and a fourth voltage to the second electrode, wherein the third voltage is an AC or DC voltage and the fourth voltage is an AC or DC voltage. 11. A system for clamping a substrate, comprising, a substrate support having a surface for supporting a substrate; a plurality of electrodes spaced from one another in or on the substrate support, the plurality of electrodes including a first electrode and a second electrode; and a controller configured to receive a measurement of substrate bow of a substrate and to determine, based on the substrate bow, a first voltage to be applied to the first electrode and a second voltage to be applied to the second electrode, and apply the first voltage to the first electrode and the second voltage to the second electrode, wherein the controller is configured to optimize substrate bow of the substrate by repeatedly receiving a measurement of substrate bow, determining the first voltage and the second voltage, and reapplying the first voltage and the second voltage based on the received measurements of substrate bow, and wherein the substrate bow of the substrate is determined to be optimized based on at least one of variation in clamp pressure or heat transfer flux. 8. A system for clamping a substrate, comprising, a substrate support having a surface for supporting a substrate; a plurality of electrodes spaced from one another in or on the substrate support, the plurality of electrodes including a first electrode and a second electrode; and a controller configured to receive a measurement of substrate bow of a substrate and to determine, based on the substrate bow, a first voltage to be applied to the first electrode and a second voltage to be applied to the second electrode, and apply the first voltage to the first electrode and the second voltage to the second electrode, wherein the first voltage is an AC voltage and the second voltage is an AC or DC voltage, wherein the controller is configured to optimize substrate bow of the substrate by repeatedly receiving a measurement of substrate bow, determining the first voltage and the second voltage, and reapplying the first voltage and the second voltage based on the received measurements of substrate bow, and wherein the substrate bow of the substrate is determined to be optimized when at least one of variation in clamp pressure or heat transfer flux are minimized. 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the plurality of electrodes are interdigitated or annular. 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the plurality of electrodes are interdigitated. 13. The system of claim 11, further comprising an electrostatic chuck, wherein the substrate support is configured to removably couple to the electrostatic chuck. 12. The system of claim 8, further comprising an electrostatic chuck, wherein the substrate support is configured to removably couple to the electrostatic chuck. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 are allowed, pending the filing of the terminal disclaimer as indicated above. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance of claim 1, 11 and 16: The prior art by Deng et al Publication No. US 2022/0310431 discloses a method for clamping a substrate, comprising, i. placing a substrate [Fig. 1, wafer 105, 220] on a clamping surface of a substrate support [Fig. 1, electrostatic chuck 130] having a plurality of electrodes [Fig. 1, securing electrodes 240C, 240M1, 240M2, 240P] spaced from one another including a first electrode and a second electrode [par. 0028]; ii. measuring substrate bow of the substrate [charge monitoring system 180; par. 0055 and Fig. 1]; iii. determining, based on the measured substrate bow, a first voltage to be applied to the first electrode and a second voltage to be applied to the second electrode; and iv. applying the first voltage to the first electrode and the second voltage to the second electrode to clamp the substrate to the substrate support [par. 0050]; and repeating ii, iii, iv until substrate bow of the substrate is determined to be optimized[ par. 0050 to par. 0063 suggest that the flatness of the various regions of the wafer 105 is monitored in real time, the voltages are lowered, disabled based on the monitoring, then reapplied as needed, until the wafer is optimized]. However, the prior art does not disclose that the substrate bow of the substrate is determined to be optimized when at least one of variation in clamp pressure or heat transfer flux. This feature in combination with the rest of the claim limitations is not anticipated or rendered obvious by the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DHARTI PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-8659. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 9 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu Tran can be reached at 571-270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DHARTI PATEL Primary Examiner Art Unit 2836 /DHARTI H PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771111
Circuit Breakers and Circuit Breaker Operational Methods
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771123
ESD PROTECTION CIRCUIT AND METHOD THEREFOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763568
OPEN NEUTRAL DETECTOR
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756022
ENERGY STORAGE APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD FOR CURRENT INTERRUPTING DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757681
MEMBER FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.7%)
2y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1272 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month