Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/070,239

RESIST COMPOSITION AND PATTERN FORMING PROCESS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 04, 2025
Priority
Mar 14, 2024 — JP 2024-039577
Examiner
EOFF, ANCA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
999 granted / 1249 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1285
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
84.4%
+44.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1249 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-9 are pending. The foreign priority application No.2024-039577 filed on March 14, 2024 in Japan has been received and it is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Masuyama et al. (US 2015/0248052) in view of Hatakeyama et al. (US 2010/0055621). With regard to claim 1, Masuyama et al. teach a photoresist composition comprising the resin A1, the compound I-1, and a mixture of organic solvents (Comp.4 in Table 1, par.0563, par.0568). The resin A1 is represented by the formula: PNG media_image1.png 184 296 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 268 366 media_image2.png Greyscale (par.0554), and the compound I-1 is represented by the formula: PNG media_image3.png 138 314 media_image3.png Greyscale (par.0492). The compound I-1 is a hypervalent iodine compound of formula (I) in claim 1, wherein R1 and R2 are C10 hydrocarbyl groups, and n=0. The first two repeating units of the resin A1 are units comprising acid-labile groups (see par.0061 and par.0078), so the resin A1 is “a polymer comprising repeating units having an acid labile groups” in claim 1. Masuyama et al. fail to teach that the resin A1 comprises a carboxy group, as required in claim 1. Hatakeyama et al. teach a photoresist and a patterning process (abstract). Hatakeyama et al. teach a base polymer which may comprise an adhesion group, such as a carboxy group, which may raise the glass transition temperature of the base polymer (Tg) and increase its mechanical strength (par.0055-0056). The base polymer may also comprise a repeating unit comprising an acid labile group (par.0079). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to include a repeating unit comprising a carboxy group in the resin A1 of Masuyama et al., in order to increase the mechanical strength of the resin. Therefore, the photoresist composition of Masuyama modified by Hatakeyama is equivalent to the resist composition in claim 1. With regard to claim 2, the repeating units of formulas: PNG media_image4.png 186 294 media_image4.png Greyscale of the resin A1 are repeating units of formula (a1), wherein RA is a methyl group, X1 is a single bond, and AL1 is an acid labile group (see definitions in par.0061 and par.0078 of Masuyama et al.). With regard to claim 3, Hatakeyama et al. teach that a repeating unit comprising a carboxy group may be represented by the formulas: PNG media_image5.png 110 112 media_image5.png Greyscale or PNG media_image6.png 244 174 media_image6.png Greyscale (par.0062, par.0120, par.0122). The repeating units above are recurring units of formula (2), wherein RA is a methyl group, XA is a single bond or a C10 hydrocarbylene group. With regard to claim 4, the repeating unit of formula: PNG media_image7.png 228 150 media_image7.png Greyscale of the resin A1 is a repeating unit of formula (c1), wherein RA is a methyl group and R21 is a C10 group comprising hydroxyl groups. With regard to claims 6 and 7, Masuyama et al. teach that the photoresist composition further comprises the photoacid generators B1-21 and B1-22 and the quenched D1 (Comp.4 in Table 1, par.0563). With regard to claim 8, Masuyama et al. teach that the photoresist composition may further comprise a surfactant (par.0450). With regard to claim 9, Masuyama et al. teach that a photoresist pattern may be produced by the following steps: -applying the photoresist composition on a substrate and drying to form a composition film; -exposing the composition film; and -developing the exposed composition film (par.0457-0462). Masuyama et al. further teach that the exposure may be performed with KrF excimer laser, ArF excimer laser, extreme ultraviolet (EUV), or electron beam (EB)(par.0478). 6. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Masuyama et al. (US 2015/0248052) in view of Hatakeyama et al. (US 2010/0055621) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Matsumaru et al. (US 2007/0231708). With regard to claim 5, Masuyama modified by Hatakeyama teach the resist composition of claim 1 (see paragraph 5 above), but fail to teach that the resin A1 comprises a repeat unit having a photoacid generating group. Matsumaru et al. teach a polymer compound capable of forming a positive resist composition, the polymer comprising a structural unit (a1) derived from an (a-lower alkyl) acrylate ester having an acid-dissociable group, and a structural unit (a2) of formula (a2-1): PNG media_image8.png 194 172 media_image8.png Greyscale (abstract, par.0010). Matsumaru et al. teach that the polymer compound is capable of forming a positive resist composition that can form a high-resolution pattern with a reduced level of LER (line edge roughness) (par.0008, abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to include a structural unit (a2) of formula (a2-1) of Matsumaru et al. in the resin A1 of Masuyama modified by Hatakeyama, in order to form a polymer capable of forming a positive resist composition that can form a high-resolution pattern with a reduced level of LER (line edge roughness). The structural unit (a2) of formula (a2-1) may be represented by the formula: PNG media_image9.png 382 296 media_image9.png Greyscale (par.0044), and it is a repeat unit having a photoacid generating group (see group (d1) in par.00132 of the specification of the instant application). Conclusion 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Nguyen et al. (US 2021/0181628) teach a resist composition comprising a hypervalent iodine compound of Chemical Formula 1 and a polymer (par.0025), and the hypervalent iodine compound of Chemical Formula 1 may be represented by the formula M1: PNG media_image10.png 136 376 media_image10.png Greyscale (par.0040). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANCA EOFF whose telephone number is (571)272-9810. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at (571)272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANCA EOFF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683144
ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658462
Hydrogen fuel cell power source with metal bipolar plates
8y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655111
Novel Phenazine-Based Compounds
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651780
BATTERY USING LAYERED DOUBLE HYDROXIDE-LIKE COMPOUND
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646733
HYDROGEN FUEL CELL POWER SOURCE WITH METAL BIPOLAR PLATES
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 8m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1249 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month