Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/076,000

HOLDING DEVICE FOR AN OPTICAL COMPONENT HAVING AN OPTICAL SURFACE WITH A POLYGONAL BORDER AND HAVING A CYLINDRICAL SUBSTRATE BODY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 11, 2025
Priority
Sep 20, 2022 — DE 102022209869.2 +1 more
Examiner
RIDDLE, CHRISTINA A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
749 granted / 927 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 927 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgement is made that the instant application is a continuation of application PCT/EP2023/074063, filed on 9/1/2023, which claims priority from DE102022209869.2, filed on 9/20/2022. Claim Objections Claims 14, 17, 18, and 20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 14, lines 3-4, “a a cylindrical” should be changed to --a cylindrical-- to remove the repeated article. Claim 17, line 1, “Optical system” should be changed to --An optical system-- to correct the missing article. Claim 18, line 9, “the projection.” should be changed to --the projection optical unit-- to correct antecedence. Claim 20, line 2, “the optical element” should be changed to --the optical component-- to correct antecedence. Appropriate correction is required to place claims in better form. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ikeda (JP2005-317675, cited by 3/11/2025 IDS with accompanying English translation, referenced below). Regarding claim 1, Ikeda discloses a holding device configured to hold an optical component comprising an optical surface with a polygonal border, the optical component comprising a cylindrical substrate body with a cylinder lateral wall with a polygonal cross section corresponding to the polygonal border of the optical surface (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pages 6 and 8 of English translation, a hexagonal lens assembly 14 is supported in a holding frame, and the hexagonal lens assembly 14 includes a cylinder lateral wall (see Figs. 2 and 4)), the holding device comprising: a holding frame (Figs. 1-8, pg. 8, lens assembly 14 is supported by holding frame 15); at least two bearing bodies configured to make bearing contact with the lateral wall of the substrate body via bearing portions of the lateral wall (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 8-9, and 11, the holding frame 15 comprises positioning members 16 to make contact with the walls of the hexagonal lens assembly 14); and at least two pressing bodies configured to exert bearing pressures acting on the substrate body from opposite directions (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 8-9, and 11, the positioning members 16 include pressure blocks 30 and adjusting members 32 to exert pressures from opposing directions). Regarding claim 2, Ikeda discloses wherein the at least two pressing bodies are configured to press directly on the lateral wall of the substrate body (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 8-9, and 11, the pressure blocks 30 and adjusting members 32 directly press the walls of the hexagonal lens assembly 14). Regarding claim 3, Ikeda discloses wherein the at least two pressing bodies press on the lateral wall of the substrate body via assigned bearing portions of the lateral wall of the substrate body in one and the same cross-sectional plane (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 8-9, and 11, pressure blocks 30 and adjusting members 32 press the outer lateral wall of the hexagonal lens assembly 14 in the same plane). Regarding claim 4, Ikeda discloses comprising exactly three pressing bodies (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, and 11, three positioning members 16 with pressure block 30 and two adjustment members 32a, 32b), wherein the exactly three pressing bodies define a holding plane via their assigned bearing portions (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, 11, the pressure block 30 and two adjustment members 32a, 32b define a holding plane in which they exert pressures on the hexagonal lens assembly 14). Regarding claim 5, Ikeda discloses wherein the holding plane is perpendicular to a cross-sectional plane of the cylinder lateral wall (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, 11, the pressure block 30 and two adjustment members 32a, 32b define the holding plane perpendicular to the cross-sectional plane of the lateral wall of the hexagonal lens assembly 14). Regarding claim 6, Ikeda discloses comprising exactly three pressing bodies (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, and 11, three positioning members 16 with pressure block 30 and two adjustment members 32a, 32b), wherein the exactly three pressing bodies define a holding plane via their assigned bearing portions (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, 11, the pressure block 30 and two adjustment members 32a, 32b define a holding plane in which they exert pressures on the hexagonal lens assembly 14). Regarding claim 7, Ikeda discloses wherein the holding plane is perpendicular to a cross-section plane of the cylinder lateral wall (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, 11, the pressure block 30 and two adjustment members 32a, 32b define the holding plane perpendicular to the cross-sectional plane of the lateral wall of the hexagonal lens assembly 14). Regarding claim 8, Ikeda discloses wherein at least one of the at least two bearing bodies comprises a manipulator (Figs. 1-4, 7, pgs. 3, 9, and 11, adjustment screws 36 move and adjust the adjustment members 32, or 32a, 32b). Regarding claim 9, Ikeda discloses wherein each of the at least two bearing bodies comprises a manipulator (Figs. 1-4, 7, pgs. 3, 9, and 11, adjustment screws 36 move and adjust the adjustment members 32, or 32a, 32b). Regarding claim 10, Ikeda discloses wherein: the at least two pressing bodies press on the lateral wall of the substrate body via assigned bearing portions of the lateral wall of the substrate body in one and the same cross-sectional plane (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 8-9, and 11, pressure blocks 30 and adjusting members 32 press the outer lateral wall of the hexagonal lens assembly 14 in the same plane); and at least one of the at least two bearing bodies comprises a manipulator (Figs. 1-4, 7, pgs. 3, 9, and 11, adjustment screws 36 move and adjust the adjustment members 32, or 32a, 32b). Regarding claim 11, Ikeda discloses wherein the at least two bearing bodies comprises three bearing bodies (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 8-9, and 11, at least three positioning members 16 in Figs. 1, 3, and 7). Regarding claim 12, Ikeda discloses wherein the three pressing bodies define a holding plane via their assigned bearing portions (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, 11, the pressure block 30 and two adjustment members 32a, 32b define a holding plane in which they exert pressures on the hexagonal lens assembly 14). Regarding claim 13, Ikeda discloses wherein the three bearing bodies define a concave contact geometry (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, 11, three positioning members 16 define concave contact surfaces), and a convex cross-sectional region of the optical component is pressable into the concave contact geometry via the at least one of the at least two pressing bodies (Figs. 3-4, pgs. 8-9, 11, the hexagonal lens assembly 14 includes convex surfaces that contact the surfaces of the three pressure blocs 30 of three positioning members 16). Regarding claim 14, Ikeda discloses an optical assembly (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6 and 8, a hexagonal lens assembly) comprising: an optical component (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6 and 8, a hexagonal lens assembly 14), comprising: an optical surface with a polygonal border (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6 and 8, a hexagonal lens assembly 14); and a a cylindrical substrate body with a cylinder lateral wall with a polygonal cross section corresponding to the polygonal border of the optical surface (Figs. 1-7, abstract, pgs. 6 and 8, hexagonal lens assembly 14 includes a hexagonal cross-section); and a holding device (Figs. 1-8, pg. 8, lens assembly 14 is supported by holding frame 15 in the optical apparatus 10), comprising: a holding frame (Figs. 1-8, pg. 8, lens assembly 14 is supported by holding frame 15); at least two bearing bodies making bearing contact with the lateral wall of the substrate body via bearing portions of the lateral wall (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 8-9 and 11, the holding frame 15 comprises positioning members 16 to make contact with the walls of the hexagonal lens assembly 14); and at least two pressing bodies exerting bearing pressures acting on the substrate body from opposite directions (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 8-9 and 11, the positioning members 16 include pressure blocks 30 and adjusting members 32 to exert pressures from opposing directions). Regarding claim 15, Ikeda discloses wherein the at least two pressing bodies press against mutually parallel surfaces of the lateral wall (Figs. 1-7, pgs. 8-9 and 11, the pressure blocks 30 press against parallel sides of the hexagonal lens assembly 14). Regarding claim 16, Ikeda discloses an optical unit (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6 and 8, an exposure apparatus illumination optical apparatus), comprising: an optical assembly according to claim 14 (see claim 14 rejection above, Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6 and 8, a hexagonal lens assembly 14), wherein the optical unit is an illumination optical unit configured to illuminate an object field (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 3, 6-8, the lens assembly 14 is in the illumination optical device 10 of the illumination optical system 41 configured to illuminate the reticle R in the exposure apparatus). Regarding claim 17, Ikeda discloses optical system (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, an exposure apparatus illumination optical apparatus), comprising: an illumination optical unit comprising an optical assembly according to claim 14 (see claim 14 rejection above, Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, illumination optical system 41 comprises a hexagonal lens assembly 14); and a projection optical unit (Fig. 8, pages 6-7, projection optical system 42), wherein the illumination optical unit configured to illuminate an object field of the projection optical unit, and the projection optical unit is configured to image the object field into an image field of the projection optical unit (Figs. 1-8, pgs. abstract, pgs. 3, 6-8, the lens assembly 14 is in the illumination optical system 41 configured to illuminate the reticle R. The image of the reticle R is projected by projection optical system 42 onto the wafer W). Regarding claim 18, Ikeda discloses an illumination system (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, an exposure apparatus illumination optical apparatus), comprising: a light source (Fig. 8, page 7, light source 47); an optical system (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, an exposure apparatus illumination optical apparatus includes illumination optical system 41 and projection optical system 42), comprising: an illumination optical unit comprising an optical assembly according to claim 14 (see claim 14 rejection above, Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, illumination optical system 41 comprises a hexagonal lens assembly 14); and a projection optical unit (Fig. 8, pages 6-7, projection optical system 42), wherein the illumination optical unit configured to illuminate an object field of the projection optical unit, and the projection optical unit is configured to image the object field onto an image field of the projection (Figs. 1-8, pgs. abstract, pgs. 3, 6-8, the lens assembly 14 is in the illumination optical system 41 configured to illuminate the reticle R. The image of the reticle R is projected by projection optical system 42 onto the wafer W). Regarding claim 19, Ikeda discloses a projection exposure apparatus (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, an exposure apparatus illumination optical apparatus), comprising: an illumination system (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, the exposure apparatus includes the light source 47, illumination optical system 41 comprising illumination optical apparatus 10), comprising: a light source (Fig. 8, page 7, light source 47); an optical system (Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, an exposure apparatus illumination optical apparatus includes illumination optical system 41), comprising: an illumination optical unit comprising an optical assembly according to claim 14 (see claim 14 rejection above, Figs. 1-8, abstract, pgs. 6-8, illumination optical apparatus 10 comprises a hexagonal lens assembly 14); and a projection optical unit (Fig. 8, pages 6-7, projection optical system 42), a first holder configured to hold a first object in an object plane of the projection optical unit (Fig. 8, pgs. 6-7, reticle stage RST holds reticle R on the object side of the projection optical system 42); and a second holder configured to hold a second object in an image plane of the projection optical unit (Fig. 8, pgs. 6-7, wafer stage WST holds wafer W in the image plane of the projection optical system 42), wherein the illumination optical unit is configured to illuminate the first object when the first object is in the object field, and the projection optical unit is configured to image the illuminated object in the object field into the second object when the second object is in the image field (Figs. 1-8, pgs. abstract, pgs. 3, 6-8, the lens assembly 14 is in the illumination optical system 41 configured to illuminate the reticle R. The image of the reticle R is projected by projection optical system 42 onto the wafer W). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 20 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. Regarding claim 20, the prior art of record, either alone or in combination, fails to teach or render obvious determining an angle between two polygon faces of the cylinder lateral wall; determining a relative position of at least two mutually spaced-apart contact points by which the bearing bodies contact the cylinder lateral wall, one of the bearing bodies making contact with one of the two polygon faces and another one of the bearing bodies making contact with the other one of the two polygon faces, with respect to at least two frame points of the holding device; and determining a relative position of the cross section of the cylinder lateral wall with respect to the holding device from the determined angle and the determined relative position. These limitations in combination with all of the other limitations of the parent claim would render the claim non-obvious over the prior art of record if rewritten. Ikeda discloses a manipulator that adjusts the bearing bodies (Figs. 1-4, 7, pgs. 3, 9, and 11, adjustment screws 36 move and adjust the adjustment members 32, or 32a, 32b), but Ikeda does not describe or render obvious determining an angle between two polygon faces of the cylinder lateral wall; determining a relative position of at least two mutually spaced-apart contact points by which the bearing bodies contact the cylinder lateral wall, one of the bearing bodies making contact with one of the two polygon faces and another one of the bearing bodies making contact with the other one of the two polygon faces, with respect to at least two frame points of the holding device; and determining a relative position of the cross section of the cylinder lateral wall with respect to the holding device from the determined angle and the determined relative position. Holderer et al. (DE10255735, cited by 3/11/2025 IDS) discloses a holding frame (Figs. 1-8, reflector bar 8 is supported by support rods 9 and 10); at least two bearing bodies configured to make bearing contact with the lateral wall of the substrate body via bearing portions of the lateral wall (Figs. 1-8, the support rods include wires 11 and 12, and wires 11 contact walls of the reflector bar 8); and at least two pressing bodies configured to exert bearing pressures acting on the substrate body from opposite directions (Figs. 1-8, wires 11 are clamped on either side of the reflector bar 8). Holderer does not describe or render obvious determining an angle between two polygon faces of the cylinder lateral wall; determining a relative position of at least two mutually spaced-apart contact points by which the bearing bodies contact the cylinder lateral wall, one of the bearing bodies making contact with one of the two polygon faces and another one of the bearing bodies making contact with the other one of the two polygon faces, with respect to at least two frame points of the holding device; and determining a relative position of the cross section of the cylinder lateral wall with respect to the holding device from the determined angle and the determined relative position. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Li et al. (WO2017/162000) discloses a holder with three fixing arms to support surface of an optical element. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINA A. RIDDLE whose telephone number is (571)270-7538. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 6:30AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached at (571)272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINA A RIDDLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706280
DETECTION DEVICE, PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND TRANSFER METHOD
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704791
VERTICAL MOTION AXIS FOR IMAGING OPTICAL HEAD
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704792
MITIGATING LONG-TERM ENERGY DECAY OF LASER DEVICES
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699325
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMBINATORIAL ARRAYS USING DYNAMIC INTERFERENCE LITHOGRAPHY
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693604
METHOD OF OBTAINING ARRAY OF PLURALITY OF REGIONS ON SUBSTRATE, EXPOSURE METHOD, EXPOSURE APPARATUS, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ARTICLE, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 11m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 927 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month