Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/277,341

POWER CONVERSION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Priority
Dec 06, 2024 — TW 113147582
Examiner
LY, XUAN
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Aph Epower Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
460 granted / 540 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
564
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
69.8%
+29.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 540 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/22/2025 and 11/20/2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-2, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li (CN117791827) in view of May (US 2006/0139819). Regarding claim 1, Li teaches A power conversion device (see figure 2), comprising: a positive power terminal (fig. 2@ upper "N" in figure 2); a negative power terminal (inherently preset for battery pack 10a in figure 2); a first output circuit (fig. 2@ transmission circuit 20a); a second output circuit (fig. 2@ transmission circuit 20b), coupled in parallel with the first output circuit (20a); a control switch (fig. 2@ shunt switch 50), coupled between the external power terminal and the positive power terminal (upper N); a battery module (fig. 2@ battery pack 10b), coupled between the positive power terminal and the negative power terminal and configured to provide a battery power (10b) to the positive power terminal (see figure 2); a first conversion circuit (fig. 2@ conversion module 30a), coupled to the external power terminal (upper N), the negative power terminal, and the first output circuit (20a); and a second conversion circuit (fig. 2@ conversion module 30b), coupled to the battery module (10b), the positive power terminal (lower N), the negative power terminal, and the second output circuit (20b), wherein when an external power at the external power terminal (upper N) is insufficient, the control switch (50) is turned on (see figure 2), so that the first conversion circuit (30a) is coupled in parallel with the second conversion circuit (30b), the battery module (10b), the first conversion circuit (30a), and the first output circuit (20a) form a first power loop during a first period, and the battery module (10b) and the second conversion circuit (30b) form a second power loop during the first period (see figure 2 and par. [n0039-n0045]). However, Li does not explicitly teaches an external power terminal. May teaches an external power terminal (fig. 1@ a non-battery power source 26) is used together with a battery (fig. 1@ battery 24). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Li with the teachings of May by having an external power terminal in order to provide an advantage that the energy in the battery last much longer, when an external power source is present an power is used from the external source. Regarding claim 2, the combination teaches wherein when the external power (non-battery power source 26; May) is sufficient, the control switch is turned off (see par. [0086]; Li). Regarding claim 16, the combination teaches when a power of the external power (10a) is sufficient and less than a power required by a load, the first conversion circuit (30a) provides a first power according to the external power (10a), and the second conversion circuit (30b) provides a second power according to the battery power (10b), (see figure 2; Li). Claims 3 and 12-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li (CN117791827) in view of May (US 2006/0139819) and further in view of Krein (US 2005/0286277). Regarding claim 3, the combination teaches the power conversion device above, but does not explicitly teach wherein when the external power is insufficient: the battery module and the first conversion circuit form a third power loop during a second period, the battery module, the second conversion circuit, and the second output circuit form a fourth power loop during the second period, wherein the second period and the first period alternate with each other. Krein teaches when the external power is insufficient: the battery module and the first conversion circuit form a third power loop during a second period, the battery module, the second conversion circuit, and the second output circuit form a fourth power loop during the second period, wherein the second period and the first period alternate with each other (see figures 8 and par. [0019] and [0028-0029], alternating operation of the first and second converter). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Li and May with the teachings of Krein by having when the external power is insufficient: the battery module and the first conversion circuit form a third power loop during a second period, the battery module, the second conversion circuit, and the second output circuit form a fourth power loop during the second period, wherein the second period and the first period alternate with each other in order to enable the system to dynamically share the load and regulate voltage. By continuously alternating power paths, it prevents hardware burnout, reduces thermal stress, and delivers stable, continuous power to the load even when the primary external source fails to meet demand. Regarding claim 12, the combination teaches wherein during the first period: the first conversion circuit (30a) provides a first power according to the battery power (10b), and the first output circuit (20a) stores the first power, and provides a first output power according to the first power (see figure 2 and par. [n0039-n0045]; Li). Regarding claim 13, the combination teaches wherein during the second period: the first output circuit (20a) provides the first output power according to a power stored during the first period (see figure 2 and par. [n0039-n0045]; Li). Regarding claim 14, the combination teaches wherein during the second period: the second conversion circuit (30b) provides a second power according to the battery power (10b), and the second output circuit (20b) stores the second power, and provides a second output power according to the second power (see figure 2 and par. [n0039-n0045]; Li). Regarding claim 15, the combination teaches wherein during the first period: the second output circuit (20b) provides the second output power according to a power stored during the second period (see figure 2 and par. [n0039-n0045]; Li). Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li (CN117791827) in view of May (US 2006/0139819) and further in view of Brombach (US 2021/0050728). Regarding claim 17, the combination teaches the power conversion device above, but does not explicitly teach wherein the external power is generated by a renewable energy. Brombach teaches the external power (fig. 3@ 204) is generated by a renewable energy (see figure 3 and par. [0079], a photovoltaic installation 204). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Li and May with the teachings of Brombach by having the external power is generated by a renewable energy in order to eliminates greenhouse gas emissions to help mitigate climate change, relies on naturally replenished resources for long-term supply security, and can protect consumers from the volatile price swings of imported fossil. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-11 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XUAN LY whose telephone number is (571)272-9885. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at 571-272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XUAN LY/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /REXFORD N BARNIE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683397
Method for Operating a Network Management System for a Local Energy Network Depending on a Storage Strategy of an Energy Store
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671312
CAPACITOR VOLTAGE BALANCING CONTROL TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-LEVEL MULTI-CHANNEL DRIVES
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671258
PROTECTION CIRCUIT AND CHARGING EQUIPMENT
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658710
BASE STATION POWER CONVERTER SUITABLE FOR SINGLE-PHASE POWER SOURCES
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12647038
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 7m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 540 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month