Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Acumino currently has 1 pending office action focused in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution activity is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a centralized examination path for the current portfolio. This concentration means that the company's legal strategy is currently focused on a specific set of transportation and mechanical systems claims rather than a broad array of diverse inventions.
The busiest examiner assigned to this work is KENIRY, HEATHER J, who handles the 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 pending action represents the entirety of the company's current office action activity. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the portfolio's current legal challenges are confined to a particular regulatory environment within the patent office. Practitioners can expect a consistent examination experience as long as the workload remains under 1 distinct examiner and within this specific technical division.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KENIRY, HEATHER J | 1 | 81.0% | +19.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18738598 | HUMAN-IN-LOOP ROBOT TRAINING AND TESTING SYSTEM WITH GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) | KENIRY, HEATHER J | 89d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18738598 | HUMAN-IN-LOOP ROBOT TRAINING AND TESTING SYSTEM WITH GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) | KENIRY, HEATHER J | 89d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3657 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18738598 | HUMAN-IN-LOOP ROBOT TRAINING AND TESTING SYSTEM WITH GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) | KENIRY, HEATHER J | 3657 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 89d overdue | Pending | Jun 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial