Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Adrc Co. Kr maintains 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, providing different perspectives on the portfolio's pending matters. Both actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, centralizing the technical review process under a single supervisory structure.
MCCALL SHEPARD, SONYA D is the busiest examiner, currently managing 1 pending office action. This means the workload is split among the 2 distinct examiners involved, as each is responsible for a portion of the pending office actions. The presence of 2 pending office actions within a single art unit allows for a consistent application of examination standards across the portfolio.
The 2 pending office actions are split between the 2 distinct examiners, which allows the company to engage with multiple individuals while remaining within the same Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics art unit. For the practitioner, this means that while the art unit remains the same, the arguments must be tailored to the specific preferences of 2 distinct examiners. This balance defines the company's current prosecution landscape.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCCALL SHEPARD, SONYA D | 1 | 92.8% | +3.5% |
| REAMES, MATTHEW L | 1 | 77.1% | +18.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18656755 | THIN FILM TRANSISTOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME | MCCALL SHEPARD, SONYA D | — |
| 18203641 | PHOTODIODE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME | REAMES, MATTHEW L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18203641 | PHOTODIODE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME | REAMES, MATTHEW L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2896 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18656755 | THIN FILM TRANSISTOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME | MCCALL SHEPARD, SONYA D | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 07, 2024 |
| 18203641 | PHOTODIODE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME | REAMES, MATTHEW L | 2896 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial