Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Aeva, Inc.

9 pending office actions • 3 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
8
Medium (89%)
1
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only8 (89%)
§112 only1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
11% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
22% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 3 77.8% +16.8%
CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T 1 74.9% +32.6%
SINGH, AVIRAJ DONGSOOK 1
EDWARDS, ETHAN WESLEY 1 78.6% +27.3%
BOLDA, ERIC L 1 86.4% +7.5%
NOEL, JEMPSON 1 65.0% +35.6%
QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 1 54.1% +32.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18104006 TOTAL INTERNAL REFLECTION (TIR) SCANNING DEVICE BOLDA, ERIC L 43d overdue

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17591393 TECHNIQUES FOR SUBBAND PROCESSING FOR A LIDAR SYSTEM QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 9d overdue
17745420 TECHNIQUES FOR BAND SPECIFIC PEAK DETECTION IN A LIDAR SYSTEM BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 13d
17703876 TECHNIQUES TO SELECT MULTIPLE RETURNS IN FREQUENCY MODULATED CONTINUOUS WAVE LIDAR SYSTEMS BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 15d
18162529 TECHNIQUES FOR FAULT DETECTION IN A LIDAR SYSTEM EDWARDS, ETHAN WESLEY 27d
18604868 System and Method for Detecting Potential Matches Between a Candidate Biometric and a Dataset of Biometrics CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T 33d
18326271 TECHNIQUES FOR POINT CLOUD FILTERING IN LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) SYSTEMS BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 34d
18104161 TECHNIQUES FOR MITIGATING CROSS-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE IN FMCW LIDAR SYSTEMS NOEL, JEMPSON 62d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3645 6
2857 2
2154 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18604868 System and Method for Detecting Potential Matches Between a Candidate Biometric and a Dataset of Biometrics CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T 2154 §103 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Mar 14, 2024
18326271 TECHNIQUES FOR POINT CLOUD FILTERING IN LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) SYSTEMS BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 3645 §112 Non-Final OA 34d Pending May 31, 2023
18125620 TECHNIQUES FOR ASSEMBLING "LIDAR ON A CHIP" TO MINIMIZE MECHANICAL VOLUME SINGH, AVIRAJ DONGSOOK 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Mar 23, 2023
18162529 TECHNIQUES FOR FAULT DETECTION IN A LIDAR SYSTEM EDWARDS, ETHAN WESLEY 2857 §103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Jan 31, 2023
18104006 TOTAL INTERNAL REFLECTION (TIR) SCANNING DEVICE BOLDA, ERIC L 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Jan 31, 2023
18104161 TECHNIQUES FOR MITIGATING CROSS-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE IN FMCW LIDAR SYSTEMS NOEL, JEMPSON 3645 §103 Final Rejection 62d Pending Jan 31, 2023
17745420 TECHNIQUES FOR BAND SPECIFIC PEAK DETECTION IN A LIDAR SYSTEM BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 3645 §103 Final Rejection 13d Pending May 16, 2022
17703876 TECHNIQUES TO SELECT MULTIPLE RETURNS IN FREQUENCY MODULATED CONTINUOUS WAVE LIDAR SYSTEMS BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 3645 §103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Mar 24, 2022
17591393 TECHNIQUES FOR SUBBAND PROCESSING FOR A LIDAR SYSTEM QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 2857 §103 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Feb 02, 2022

Managing Aeva, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month