Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
AG Materials Technology Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This prosecution activity is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, showing a very focused path for the company's current patent applications. ISAAC, STANETTA D is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing the 1 pending office action.
The presence of 1 pending office action means that the company's immediate prosecution success relies on the 1 distinct examiner assigned to the case. Since all activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, practitioners can tailor their arguments to the specific standards of that unit within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field. ISAAC, STANETTA D holds the entirety of the pending workload with 1 pending office action, making her individual examination trends the primary variable for the practitioner to consider.
This concentrated data suggests a streamlined prosecution environment where the practitioner can focus on a single set of examiner behaviors. The lack of diversity in examiners and art units simplifies the strategic planning process, as there are no conflicting examiner styles to balance. Practitioners should utilize this focus to provide highly specific responses that address the unique technical requirements of the 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISAAC, STANETTA D | 1 | 85.8% | -36.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18193012 | BACK SIDE METALLIZATION THIN FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME | ISAAC, STANETTA D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2898 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18193012 | BACK SIDE METALLIZATION THIN FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME | ISAAC, STANETTA D | 2898 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial