Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (67%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEDEON, BRIAN T | 1 | 87.0% | +7.1% |
| SHELTON, SETH CAPRIANO-UMA | 1 | — | — |
| EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT | 1 | 70.5% | +34.8% |
| BROWN, KYLE MARTZ | 1 | 9.1% | +2.8% |
| BAKKAR, AYA ZIAD | 1 | 63.9% | +42.2% |
| TEHRANI, DANIEL | 1 | 60.7% | +49.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18806620 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF QT INTERVAL ANALYSIS | GEDEON, BRIAN T | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17553414 | TWELVE-LEAD ELECTROCARDIOGRAM USING ELECTRODES COUPLED BY A SINGLE CABLE | BROWN, KYLE MARTZ | 81d overdue |
| 18161641 | SIX LEAD ECG DEVICE WITH A REDUCED FORM FACTOR | EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17116905 | TWELVE-LEAD ELECTROCARDIOGRAM USING A THREE-ELECTRODE DEVICE | TEHRANI, DANIEL | 60d overdue |
| 18161641 | SIX LEAD ECG DEVICE WITH A REDUCED FORM FACTOR | EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT | — |
| 17539164 | MULTI-LEAD ELECTRODE PLACEMENT ON A WEARABLE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM DEVICE | BAKKAR, AYA ZIAD | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3792 | 2 |
| 3794 | 1 |
| 3796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18806620 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF QT INTERVAL ANALYSIS | GEDEON, BRIAN T | — | §102§103DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 15, 2024 |
| 18407346 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ANALYTE MEASUREMENT ANALYSIS | SHELTON, SETH CAPRIANO-UMA | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 08, 2024 |
| 18161641 | SIX LEAD ECG DEVICE WITH A REDUCED FORM FACTOR | EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT | 3792 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 30, 2023 |
| 17553414 | TWELVE-LEAD ELECTROCARDIOGRAM USING ELECTRODES COUPLED BY A SINGLE CABLE | BROWN, KYLE MARTZ | 3794 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 81d overdue | Pending | Dec 16, 2021 |
| 17539164 | MULTI-LEAD ELECTRODE PLACEMENT ON A WEARABLE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM DEVICE | BAKKAR, AYA ZIAD | 3796 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 30, 2021 |
| 17116905 | TWELVE-LEAD ELECTROCARDIOGRAM USING A THREE-ELECTRODE DEVICE | TEHRANI, DANIEL | 3792 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 60d overdue | Pending | Dec 09, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial