Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Amplitel Pty Ltd currently manages 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being processed within 1 distinct art unit. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a concentrated effort for the company's active patent matters. This focus within a single art unit allows the company to apply a consistent strategy to its current intellectual property in the Transportation sector.
OMAR F HIJAZ is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling the 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending action and 1 distinct examiner, the company's current interactions with the patent office are focused on a single point of contact. This provides a clear path for responding to the examiner's requirements. Practitioners can tailor their arguments specifically to OMAR F HIJAZ, as this 1 distinct examiner is the sole individual responsible for the company's active prosecution.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIJAZ, OMAR F | 1 | 55.5% | +35.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18840219 | Monopole Tower Assembly | HIJAZ, OMAR F | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18840219 | Monopole Tower Assembly | HIJAZ, OMAR F | 3635 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial