Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Apogee 5G Global LLC

Technology area: Networking & Security

19 pending office actions • 16 art units • 18 examiners • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 50 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Apogee 5G Global LLC is managing a portfolio with 17 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These actions are distributed across 16 distinct examiners, indicating a broad prosecution effort. This high number of examiners suggests that the company is engaging with a wide variety of perspectives across the patent office. Such a diverse array of examiners can lead to varying interpretations of the same core technology.

SHIMA MOHAMED WASEL is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for 2 pending office actions. The concentration of the 17 pending actions across 14 distinct art units suggests some overlap in departmental focus. For a practitioner, this distribution requires managing many different examiner relationships simultaneously to advance the pending office actions. This complexity necessitates a highly coordinated approach to ensure consistency across the 14 distinct art units involved in the current prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
2
Due this week
1
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (32%)
13
Medium (68%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only13 (68%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (32%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
18
Information Tech
95% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WASEL, SHIMA MOHAMED 2 70.6% +47.1%
KHIRODHAR, MAHARISHI V 1 87.5% +12.4%
KIM, WON TAE C 1 88.9% -2.2%
SANTOS, FRANCESCA LIMA 1 87.5% +18.2%
GOODWIN, SCHQUITA D 1 67.6% +13.0%
DIABY, MOUSTAPHA 1 84.0% +9.8%
ELPENORD, CANDAL 1 89.8% +12.5%
MUI, GARY 1 87.5% +2.0%
LEMA LEMOS, LUIS GUILLERMO 1 60.0% +50.0%
HENSON, JAMAAL R 1 84.3% +4.5%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18634983 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR NETWORK ENERGY SAVING STATE-BASED MEASUREMENT OBJECT USE SANTOS, FRANCESCA LIMA 41d
18934252 METHOD AND DEVICE IN A NODE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION KHIRODHAR, MAHARISHI V —
18509334 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ELPENORD, CANDAL —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17950130 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DIVECHA, KAMAL B 30d overdue
18235359 METHOD AND DEVICE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION HENSON, JAMAAL R 72d
18666840 METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION KIM, WON TAE C —
18633497 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION GOODWIN, SCHQUITA D —
18537847 METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DIABY, MOUSTAPHA —
18379167 METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MUI, GARY —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18242530 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION LEMA LEMOS, LUIS GUILLERMO 6d
18634983 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR NETWORK ENERGY SAVING STATE-BASED MEASUREMENT OBJECT USE SANTOS, FRANCESCA LIMA 41d
17973491 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION WASEL, SHIMA MOHAMED 55d
18934252 METHOD AND DEVICE IN A NODE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION KHIRODHAR, MAHARISHI V —
18633497 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION GOODWIN, SCHQUITA D —
18581399 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION WASEL, SHIMA MOHAMED —
18509334 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ELPENORD, CANDAL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2475 2
2474 2
2477 2
2463 1
2414 1
2468 1
2459 1
2683 1
2473 1
2465 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18934252 METHOD AND DEVICE IN A NODE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION KHIRODHAR, MAHARISHI V 2463 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 01, 2024
18666840 METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION KIM, WON TAE C 2414 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 17, 2024
18634983 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR NETWORK ENERGY SAVING STATE-BASED MEASUREMENT OBJECT USE SANTOS, FRANCESCA LIMA 2468 §103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Apr 14, 2024
18633497 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION GOODWIN, SCHQUITA D 2459 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 11, 2024
18581399 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION WASEL, SHIMA MOHAMED 2475 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 20, 2024
18537847 METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DIABY, MOUSTAPHA 2683 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2023
18509334 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ELPENORD, CANDAL 2473 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2023
18379167 METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MUI, GARY 2465 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 12, 2023
18242530 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION LEMA LEMOS, LUIS GUILLERMO 2419 §103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Sep 06, 2023
18235359 METHOD AND DEVICE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION HENSON, JAMAAL R 2411 §102§103 Final Rejection 72d Pending Aug 18, 2023
18197109 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ZHAO, YONGHONG 2472 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 15, 2023
18123994 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION COX, BRIAN P 2474 §103 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Mar 21, 2023
17990728 METHOD AND DEVICE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION KANG, SUK JIN 2477 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Nov 20, 2022
17985123 METHOD AND DEVICE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION KIM, ANDREW CHANUL 2471 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 10, 2022
17973491 METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION WASEL, SHIMA MOHAMED 2475 §103 Non-Final OA 55d Pending Oct 25, 2022
17963996 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MULTCASTRADIO BEARER CONFIGURATION IN MULTIMEDIA BROADCAST MULTICAST SERVICE LEE, SANG CHEON 2467 §103 Final Rejection 55d Pending Oct 11, 2022
17950130 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DIVECHA, KAMAL B 2453 §103§112 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Sep 22, 2022
17557065 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR USE IN MULTIMEDIA BROADCAST MULTICAST SERVICE SHIVERS, ASHLEY L 2477 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 21, 2021
16152007 METHOD AND DEVICE IN UE AND BASE STATION USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION PEREZ, JOSE L 2474 §103 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Oct 04, 2018

Managing Apogee 5G Global LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Apogee 5G Global LLC have?

Apogee 5G Global LLC has 19 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 16 art units and 18 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Apogee 5G Global LLC applications?

Shima Mohamed Wasel has the most, with 2 of Apogee 5G Global LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Apogee 5G Global LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month