Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026

Asana Inc.

12 pending office actions • 7 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (17%)
2
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (25%)
§101 + other3 (25%)
§103 only2 (17%)
Double-patenting only2 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
58% of docket
2
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, TAN D 2 24.3% +19.1%
SITTNER, MATTHEW T 1 57.9% +56.1%
STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R 1 37.1% +29.3%
NGUYEN, CINDY 1 78.3% +9.1%
EDMONDS, DONALD J 1 40.4% +36.2%
KELLER, MICHAEL A 1 86.5% +15.9%
NGUYEN, THU N 1 71.8% +26.0%
YOUNG, ASHLEY YA-SHEH 1 30.3% +17.4%
KONERU, SUJAY 1 58.1% +37.3%
BOYCE, ANDRE D 1 36.0% +18.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18899919 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO EXECUTE BRANCHING AUTOMATION SCHEMES IN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT KELLER, MICHAEL A

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19066602 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AUTOMATICALLY CLASSIFY RECORDS MANAGED BY A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT NGUYEN, CINDY 58d overdue
18662386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE AGENDAS FOR GROUP MEETINGS KONERU, SUJAY 15d
18662530 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE MEASURES OF USER WORKLOAD WHEN GENERATING UNITS OF WORK BASED ON CHAT SESSIONS BETWEEN USERS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT NGUYEN, TAN D 28d
18897386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE UNITS OF WORK WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON SELECTION OF TEXT NGUYEN, THU N 70d
19340979 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ATTRIBUTE AUTOMATED ACTIONS WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT NGUYEN, TAN D
19191878 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO CHARACTERIZE WORK UNIT RECORDS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON STAGES WITHIN A WORKFLOW SITTNER, MATTHEW T
19066655 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE RECORDS FOR NEW USERS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R
18748457 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO MEASURE AND VISUALIZE WORKLOAD FOR INDIVIDUAL USERS YOUNG, ASHLEY YA-SHEH

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18453864 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO EFFECTUATE SETS OF AUTOMATED ACTIONS OUTSIDE AND/OR WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON TRIGGER EVENTS OCCURRING OUTSIDE AND/OR WITHIN THE COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BOYCE, ANDRE D 72d overdue
18956704 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE UNITS OF WORK IN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT EDMONDS, DONALD J 11d overdue
18662386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE AGENDAS FOR GROUP MEETINGS KONERU, SUJAY 15d
18662530 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE MEASURES OF USER WORKLOAD WHEN GENERATING UNITS OF WORK BASED ON CHAT SESSIONS BETWEEN USERS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT NGUYEN, TAN D 28d
18897386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE UNITS OF WORK WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON SELECTION OF TEXT NGUYEN, THU N 70d
19340979 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ATTRIBUTE AUTOMATED ACTIONS WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT NGUYEN, TAN D
19191878 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO CHARACTERIZE WORK UNIT RECORDS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON STAGES WITHIN A WORKFLOW SITTNER, MATTHEW T
19066655 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE RECORDS FOR NEW USERS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3629 4
2156 1
2154 1
3625 1
3624 1
3623 1
2174 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19340979 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ATTRIBUTE AUTOMATED ACTIONS WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT NGUYEN, TAN D 3629 DP Non-Final OA Pending Sep 26, 2025
19191878 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO CHARACTERIZE WORK UNIT RECORDS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON STAGES WITHIN A WORKFLOW SITTNER, MATTHEW T 3629 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 28, 2025
19066655 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE RECORDS FOR NEW USERS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R §101 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 28, 2025
19066602 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AUTOMATICALLY CLASSIFY RECORDS MANAGED BY A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT NGUYEN, CINDY 2156 §102§103Other Non-Final OA 58d overdue Pending Feb 28, 2025
18956704 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE UNITS OF WORK IN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT EDMONDS, DONALD J 3629 §103 Final Rejection 11d overdue Pending Nov 22, 2024
18899919 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO EXECUTE BRANCHING AUTOMATION SCHEMES IN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT KELLER, MICHAEL A DP Non-Final OA Pending Sep 27, 2024
18897386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE UNITS OF WORK WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON SELECTION OF TEXT NGUYEN, THU N 2154 §101§103 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Sep 26, 2024
18748457 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO MEASURE AND VISUALIZE WORKLOAD FOR INDIVIDUAL USERS YOUNG, ASHLEY YA-SHEH 3625 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 20, 2024
18662530 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE MEASURES OF USER WORKLOAD WHEN GENERATING UNITS OF WORK BASED ON CHAT SESSIONS BETWEEN USERS OF A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT NGUYEN, TAN D 3629 §101 Final Rejection 28d Pending May 13, 2024
18662386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE AGENDAS FOR GROUP MEETINGS KONERU, SUJAY 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection 15d Pending May 13, 2024
18453864 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO EFFECTUATE SETS OF AUTOMATED ACTIONS OUTSIDE AND/OR WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON TRIGGER EVENTS OCCURRING OUTSIDE AND/OR WITHIN THE COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BOYCE, ANDRE D 3623 §103 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Aug 22, 2023
18451406 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO EFFECTUATE SETS OF AUTOMATED ACTIONS WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT INCLUDING EMBEDDED THIRD-PARTY CONTENT BASED ON TRIGGER EVENTS PARCHER, DANIEL W 2174 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 17, 2023

Managing Asana Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month