Technology area: Computing & Software
7 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ascenium, Inc. has 7 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The docket is handled by 3 distinct examiners within 1 distinct art unit, showing examiner concentration inside a single technical examination setting.
HUISMAN, DAVID J is the busiest examiner, with 4 pending matters. That examiner handles the largest identified portion of the docket, making consistency in claim amendments and argument strategy especially important for related matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (43%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 4 (57%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUISMAN, DAVID J | 4 | 57.7% | +34.1% |
| DOMAN, SHAWN | 2 | 64.9% | +25.9% |
| ALCANTARA-RAMOS, EMILIO | 1 | 58.3% | +100.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18228001 | PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH DUAL LOAD BUFFERS | HUISMAN, DAVID J | 30d overdue |
| 19053495 | COMPILER GENERATED HYPERBLOCKS IN A PARALLEL ARCHITECTURE WITH COMPUTE SLICES | DOMAN, SHAWN | — |
| 18826260 | SEMANTIC ORDERING FOR PARALLEL ARCHITECTURE WITH COMPUTE SLICES | ALCANTARA-RAMOS, EMILIO | — |
| 17465949 | HIGHLY PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH SHALLOW PIPELINE | HUISMAN, DAVID J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18220331 | PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH COUNTDOWN TAGGING | HUISMAN, DAVID J | 74d overdue |
| 18228001 | PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH DUAL LOAD BUFFERS | HUISMAN, DAVID J | 30d overdue |
| 18236442 | PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH BIN PACKING | HUISMAN, DAVID J | 17d overdue |
| 19053495 | COMPILER GENERATED HYPERBLOCKS IN A PARALLEL ARCHITECTURE WITH COMPUTE SLICES | DOMAN, SHAWN | — |
| 18826260 | SEMANTIC ORDERING FOR PARALLEL ARCHITECTURE WITH COMPUTE SLICES | ALCANTARA-RAMOS, EMILIO | — |
| 17551276 | HIGHLY PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE USING DUAL BRANCH EXECUTION | DOMAN, SHAWN | — |
| 17465949 | HIGHLY PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH SHALLOW PIPELINE | HUISMAN, DAVID J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2183 | 7 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19053495 | COMPILER GENERATED HYPERBLOCKS IN A PARALLEL ARCHITECTURE WITH COMPUTE SLICES | DOMAN, SHAWN | 2183 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 14, 2025 |
| 18826260 | SEMANTIC ORDERING FOR PARALLEL ARCHITECTURE WITH COMPUTE SLICES | ALCANTARA-RAMOS, EMILIO | 2183 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 06, 2024 |
| 18236442 | PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH BIN PACKING | HUISMAN, DAVID J | 2183 | §103 | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Aug 22, 2023 |
| 18228001 | PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH DUAL LOAD BUFFERS | HUISMAN, DAVID J | 2183 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 30d overdue | Pending | Jul 31, 2023 |
| 18220331 | PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH COUNTDOWN TAGGING | HUISMAN, DAVID J | 2183 | §103 | Final Rejection | 74d overdue | Pending | Jul 11, 2023 |
| 17551276 | HIGHLY PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE USING DUAL BRANCH EXECUTION | DOMAN, SHAWN | 2183 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 15, 2021 |
| 17465949 | HIGHLY PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH SHALLOW PIPELINE | HUISMAN, DAVID J | 2183 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 03, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAscenium, Inc. has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.
David J Huisman has the most, with 4 of Ascenium, Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
