Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

David J Huisman, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as HUISMAN, DAVID J

Tech Center 2100 • Art Units: 2100 2183

This examiner grants 58% of resolved cases

Analysis

HUISMAN, DAVID J is assigned to Tech Center 2100 and Art Unit 2100. The record includes 688 resolved cases, an allowance rate of 57.7%, and a median of 1712 days to allowance. The interview lift is 34.1%, indicating that direct discussion may help in a prosecution setting where allowance can require substantial time.

Intel Corporation, Ascenium, Inc., and ARM Limited are the listed companies. Adams Intellex, PLC, MBM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGENCY, and Akona IP PC - Intel are the listed firms. Practitioners should develop interview-ready amendment positions while planning for extended prosecution and preserving alternatives in claim scope.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

57.7%
Allow Rate
+2.7% vs TC avg
783
Total Applications
+34.1%
Interview Lift
1712
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 688 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

6.6%
§101 Eligibility
19.8%
§102 Novelty
34.9%
§103 Obviousness
32.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19173390 DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING APPARATUS AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF Non-Final OA Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
19018977 Prefetcher based on PC-relative Operations Final Rejection Apple Inc.
19184604 TERMINAL DEVICE, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING DATA BASED ON MODEL, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Non-Final OA Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
18665725 DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF CONTEXT-SENSITIVE INDIRECT BRANCHES IN INDIRECT TARGET PREDICTORS Final Rejection HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
18380409 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SOFTWARE-DIRECTED INHIBITING OF BRANCH PREDICTION IN COMPUTING DEVICES Final Rejection HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
18411185 COMPUTATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OBSERVING OPERATION STATE BASED ON MASK INFORMATION TO PARALLELIZE INSTRUCTIONS Final Rejection FUJITSU LIMITED
19232644 MULTI-VECTOR RENAMING TO AVOID BANK WRITE CONFLICTS Non-Final OA QUALCOMM Incorporated
18436982 BFLOAT16 COMPARISON INSTRUCTIONS Final Rejection Intel Corporation
18399473 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING A FUSED MULTIPLY-ADD INSTRUCTION FOR COMPLEX NUMBERS Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
18217428 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PREFETCHING DATA WITH HINTS Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
17958382 INSTRUCTIONS TO CONVERT FROM FP8 Final Rejection Intel Corporation
17530156 RUNTIME CONFIGURABLE REGISTER FILES FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WORKLOADS Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
17512119 HARDWARE PROCESSORS AND METHODS FOR EXTENDED MICROCODE PATCHING Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
17904081 ACCESSING COMPRESSED FIRMWARE DATA USING HEADER INFORMATION Final Rejection Micron Technology, Inc.
18984970 OPTIMIZING FPGA RESOURCE UTILIZATION WITH DSP-BASED MASK OPERATORS Non-Final OA Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
18103796 PARALLELIZING MULTI-PHASE KERNELS WITH CROSS-PHASE DEPENDENCY ON HETEROGENOUS HARDWARE Non-Final OA Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
18174715 INSTRUCTION PACKING SCHEME FOR VLIW CPU ARCHITECTURE Non-Final OA TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
18089582 MEMORY CONTROLLER AND MEMORY SYSTEM FOR GENERATING INSTRUCTION SET BASED ON NON-INTERLEAVING BLOCK GROUP INFORMATION Non-Final OA SK hynix Inc.
17021819 PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SELECTING MEMORY ZONES FROM RESPECTIVE POSITIONS OF INSTRUCTIONS OF A PROGRAM Non-Final OA STMicroelectronics (Grenoble 2) SAS
18148873 Permute Instructions for Register-Based Lookups Final Rejection Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
17843640 Controlling Instruction Dispatch based on Counts of Dynamic VLIW Data Communications Final Rejection Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner David J Huisman's allowance rate?

57.7% of resolved applications examined by David J Huisman were allowed (688 resolved cases), compared with 38.8% across Art Unit 2100 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner David J Huisman?

This examiner's interview lift is +34.1 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner David J Huisman take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by David J Huisman took 1,712 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner David J Huisman work in?

David J Huisman examines applications in Art Unit 2100 in Tech Center 2100 (Computing & Software).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month