Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 62 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (60%) |
| §102 only | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LE, THIEN MINH | 1 | 88.5% | +7.6% |
| TARDIF, DAVID P | 1 | 72.1% | +10.2% |
| BROWN, VERNAL U | 1 | 69.6% | +13.9% |
| KIM, BRYAN | 1 | 28.7% | +36.7% |
| WHITAKER, ANDREW B | 1 | 18.8% | +19.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18727802 | DUAL RFID ANTENNA | LE, THIEN MINH | 52d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17761732 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DIGITAL TRIGGERS AND DIGITAL TWINS | WHITAKER, ANDREW B | 138d overdue |
| 17787667 | TWO-PART RFID TAGS FOR INCORPORATION INTO MICROWAVABLE FOOD PACKAGING | KIM, BRYAN | 56d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17761732 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DIGITAL TRIGGERS AND DIGITAL TWINS | WHITAKER, ANDREW B | 138d overdue |
| 18726143 | METALLIC PACKAGING CONTAINING AN INTEGRATED RFID INLAY | TARDIF, DAVID P | 46d overdue |
| 18711638 | AN INTEGRATED READER SYSTEM | BROWN, VERNAL U | 41d |
| 17787667 | TWO-PART RFID TAGS FOR INCORPORATION INTO MICROWAVABLE FOOD PACKAGING | KIM, BRYAN | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2876 | 2 |
| 2686 | 1 |
| 1792 | 1 |
| 3629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18727802 | DUAL RFID ANTENNA | LE, THIEN MINH | 2876 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 52d overdue | Pending | Jul 10, 2024 |
| 18726143 | METALLIC PACKAGING CONTAINING AN INTEGRATED RFID INLAY | TARDIF, DAVID P | 2876 | §102 | Final Rejection | 46d overdue | Pending | Jul 02, 2024 |
| 18711638 | AN INTEGRATED READER SYSTEM | BROWN, VERNAL U | 2686 | §103 | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | May 20, 2024 |
| 17787667 | TWO-PART RFID TAGS FOR INCORPORATION INTO MICROWAVABLE FOOD PACKAGING | KIM, BRYAN | 1792 | §103 | Final Rejection | 56d | Pending | Jun 21, 2022 |
| 17761732 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DIGITAL TRIGGERS AND DIGITAL TWINS | WHITAKER, ANDREW B | 3629 | §103 | Final Rejection | 138d overdue | Pending | Mar 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial