Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Azoteq Holdings Limited

Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Azoteq Holdings Limited currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners, which indicates that each pending matter is receiving an independent review. This one-to-one ratio between actions and examiners suggests a lack of examiner-level concentration, potentially leading to varied prosecution experiences across the portfolio. The workload is spread across 3 distinct art units, showing that the company's technical subject matter falls under multiple specialized administrative groups.

ZAKARIA, AKM is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the busiest examiner pending count is only 1, the workload is perfectly balanced among the 4 distinct examiners involved. This distribution across 3 distinct art units in the Communications sector suggests that the company's patent strategy must account for the different requirements of multiple technical units and individual reviewers. With 4 pending office actions total, practitioners should be prepared for diverse feedback, as the 4 distinct examiners may have different interpretations of the communications-related claims.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
50% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZAKARIA, AKM 1 82.6% +16.1%
ABEBE, SOSINA 1 72.9% +18.0%
CHATLY, AMIT 1 67.9% +13.3%
HEALY, NOAH MICHAEL 1 57.8% +34.8%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18204990 WAKE-UP CIRCUIT HEALY, NOAH MICHAEL 33d
19016097 INDUCTIVE TOUCH SCREEN ABEBE, SOSINA 43d
19035221 NON-CONTACT INDUCTIVE SWITCH ZAKARIA, AKM —
18791728 MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS USING INDUCTANCE MEASUREMENTS CHATLY, AMIT —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18204990 WAKE-UP CIRCUIT HEALY, NOAH MICHAEL 33d
19016097 INDUCTIVE TOUCH SCREEN ABEBE, SOSINA 43d
19035221 NON-CONTACT INDUCTIVE SWITCH ZAKARIA, AKM —
18791728 MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS USING INDUCTANCE MEASUREMENTS CHATLY, AMIT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2626 1
2624 1
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19035221 NON-CONTACT INDUCTIVE SWITCH ZAKARIA, AKM — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 23, 2025
19016097 INDUCTIVE TOUCH SCREEN ABEBE, SOSINA 2626 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 43d Pending Jan 10, 2025
18791728 MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS USING INDUCTANCE MEASUREMENTS CHATLY, AMIT 2624 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 01, 2024
18204990 WAKE-UP CIRCUIT HEALY, NOAH MICHAEL 3791 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 33d Pending Jun 02, 2023

Managing Azoteq Holdings Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month