Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (50%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BERARDESCA, PAUL M | 1 | 79.2% | +17.2% |
| ENGLISH, ALECIA DIANE | 1 | 42.0% | +9.7% |
| BARTELS, CHRISTOPHER A. | 1 | 67.6% | +12.1% |
| MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS | 1 | 85.5% | +1.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18828786 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MAKING FUNCTIONAL DEVICES AVAILABLE TO PARTICIPANTS OF MEETINGS | MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS | 34d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18862077 | THREE DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL DIRECTOR | BERARDESCA, PAUL M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18911814 | ELECTRONIC TOOL AND METHODS WITH AUDIO FOR MEETINGS | BARTELS, CHRISTOPHER A. | 44d overdue |
| 18862077 | THREE DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL DIRECTOR | BERARDESCA, PAUL M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2637 | 1 |
| 2625 | 1 |
| 2184 | 1 |
| 2175 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18862077 | THREE DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL DIRECTOR | BERARDESCA, PAUL M | 2637 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 31, 2024 |
| 18860996 | AUTOMATIC MODULE ARRAY MAPPING WITH INHERENT REDUNDANCY | ENGLISH, ALECIA DIANE | 2625 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 28, 2024 |
| 18911814 | ELECTRONIC TOOL AND METHODS WITH AUDIO FOR MEETINGS | BARTELS, CHRISTOPHER A. | 2184 | §103Other | Final Rejection | 44d overdue | Pending | Oct 10, 2024 |
| 18828786 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MAKING FUNCTIONAL DEVICES AVAILABLE TO PARTICIPANTS OF MEETINGS | MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS | 2175 | §103§112DP | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Sep 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial