Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Barco N.V.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Barco N.V. currently manages 4 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. The portfolio exhibits high diversity in its prosecution, with 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units involved. This distribution means that every pending case is being evaluated in a unique administrative and technical environment, requiring the company to manage 4 separate prosecution tracks simultaneously. Practitioners should note that the lack of concentration in a single art unit or examiner prevents the use of a centralized strategy for these pending matters.

The busiest examiner for the company is BERARDESCA, PAUL M, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the 4 pending office actions are distributed across 4 distinct examiners, no single examiner holds a majority of the workload. The involvement of 4 distinct art units suggests that the company's computing and software innovations span a wide range of technical sub-categories, each requiring a tailored prosecution approach. Success in this environment depends on addressing the specific requirements of 4 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
40% of docket
2
Communications
40% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BERARDESCA, PAUL M 1 79.3% +17.1%
ENGLISH, ALECIA DIANE 1 42.0% +9.7%
BARTELS, CHRISTOPHER A. 1 67.9% +11.8%
MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS 1 85.4% +1.9%
LE, BAO-LUAN Q 1 52.4% +16.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18828786 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MAKING FUNCTIONAL DEVICES AVAILABLE TO PARTICIPANTS OF MEETINGS MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS 34d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18862077 THREE DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL DIRECTOR BERARDESCA, PAUL M —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18911814 ELECTRONIC TOOL AND METHODS WITH AUDIO FOR MEETINGS BARTELS, CHRISTOPHER A. 44d overdue
18862077 THREE DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL DIRECTOR BERARDESCA, PAUL M —
17757106 A LASER REFLECTION UNIT LE, BAO-LUAN Q —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2637 1
2625 1
2184 1
2175 1
2882 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18862077 THREE DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL DIRECTOR BERARDESCA, PAUL M 2637 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18860996 AUTOMATIC MODULE ARRAY MAPPING WITH INHERENT REDUNDANCY ENGLISH, ALECIA DIANE 2625 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18911814 ELECTRONIC TOOL AND METHODS WITH AUDIO FOR MEETINGS BARTELS, CHRISTOPHER A. 2184 §103Other Final Rejection 44d overdue Pending Oct 10, 2024
18828786 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MAKING FUNCTIONAL DEVICES AVAILABLE TO PARTICIPANTS OF MEETINGS MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS 2175 §103§112DP Final Rejection 34d Pending Sep 09, 2024
17757106 A LASER REFLECTION UNIT LE, BAO-LUAN Q 2882 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 09, 2022

Managing Barco N.V.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month