Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

BOOMI, INC.

7 pending office actions • 7 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§101 + other2 (29%)
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
43% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, KIM T 1 87.2% +8.3%
VY, HUNG T 1 86.2% +2.1%
MOLES, JAMES P 1 61.0% +38.5%
BADER, ROBERT N. 1 44.4% +25.7%
BROWN, SARA GRACE 1 29.1% +32.2%
CHUNG, ANDREW 1 54.8% +32.0%
EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A 1 41.4% +39.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19256881 MULTI-AGENT FRAMEWORK FOR OPTIMIZED QUERY EXECUTION IN FEDERATED DATA SYSTEMS NGUYEN, KIM T

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18754821 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INTELLIGENT TRANSLATION OF METADATA LABEL NAMES AND MAPPING TO NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING CHUNG, ANDREW 46d overdue
18756656 RECOMMENDATION ENGINE FOR SUGGESTING INTEGRATION PROCESSES USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BROWN, SARA GRACE 29d
18438244 ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE-ASSISTED ERROR PREDICTION IN INTEGRATION PROCESSES EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A 39d
19255212 HYBRID ARCHITECTURE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WITH ITERATIVE LOCAL-GLOBAL MODEL FEEDBACK LOOP FOR CONTINUOUS LEARNING VY, HUNG T

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18754821 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INTELLIGENT TRANSLATION OF METADATA LABEL NAMES AND MAPPING TO NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING CHUNG, ANDREW 46d overdue
18756656 RECOMMENDATION ENGINE FOR SUGGESTING INTEGRATION PROCESSES USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BROWN, SARA GRACE 29d
18438244 ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE-ASSISTED ERROR PREDICTION IN INTEGRATION PROCESSES EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A 39d
19010551 UNIFIED GOVERNANCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENTS MOLES, JAMES P
18776008 HEATMAP IN LOW-CODE INTEGRATION ENVIRONMENT BADER, ROBERT N.

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2153 1
2163 1
2494 1
2611 1
3625 1
2898 1
3623 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19256881 MULTI-AGENT FRAMEWORK FOR OPTIMIZED QUERY EXECUTION IN FEDERATED DATA SYSTEMS NGUYEN, KIM T 2153 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 01, 2025
19255212 HYBRID ARCHITECTURE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WITH ITERATIVE LOCAL-GLOBAL MODEL FEEDBACK LOOP FOR CONTINUOUS LEARNING VY, HUNG T 2163 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 30, 2025
19010551 UNIFIED GOVERNANCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENTS MOLES, JAMES P 2494 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 06, 2025
18776008 HEATMAP IN LOW-CODE INTEGRATION ENVIRONMENT BADER, ROBERT N. 2611 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 17, 2024
18756656 RECOMMENDATION ENGINE FOR SUGGESTING INTEGRATION PROCESSES USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BROWN, SARA GRACE 3625 §101§103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Jun 27, 2024
18754821 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INTELLIGENT TRANSLATION OF METADATA LABEL NAMES AND MAPPING TO NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING CHUNG, ANDREW 2898 §102§103 Non-Final OA 46d overdue Pending Jun 26, 2024
18438244 ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE-ASSISTED ERROR PREDICTION IN INTEGRATION PROCESSES EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A 3623 §101 Non-Final OA 39d Pending Feb 09, 2024

Managing BOOMI, INC.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month