Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Brose Fahrzeugteile SE &Co Kommanditgesellschaft Bamberg is currently navigating 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This singular focus indicates a specific technical review process for the company's current filing. By operating within 1 art unit, the company maintains a narrow procedural footprint at the patent office. This structure allows the legal team to focus their resources on the requirements of a specific technical group within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
The busiest examiner is BEMKO, TARAS P, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This 1 action constitutes the total pending workload of 1 office action. The prosecution is currently handled by 1 examiner, making them the sole point of contact for the company's active case. For the practitioner, understanding the specific preferences of BEMKO, TARAS P is the primary factor in the current prosecution strategy. The outcome of the 1 pending office action will be determined by the review and feedback provided by this identified examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEMKO, TARAS P | 1 | 84.4% | +19.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18524995 | DRIVE ARRANGEMENT FOR ADJUSTING A FLAP OF A MOTOR VEHICLE | BEMKO, TARAS P | 15d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18524995 | DRIVE ARRANGEMENT FOR ADJUSTING A FLAP OF A MOTOR VEHICLE | BEMKO, TARAS P | 15d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3672 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18524995 | DRIVE ARRANGEMENT FOR ADJUSTING A FLAP OF A MOTOR VEHICLE | BEMKO, TARAS P | 3672 | §103 | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | Nov 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial