Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

CALB Co., Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 26 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

CALB Co., Ltd. is navigating 6 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are distributed across 6 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. This distribution shows that the company's prosecution activity is spread across several administrative channels rather than being concentrated in a specific unit.

The busiest examiner, KENLAW, GRACE A, is responsible for 1 pending office action. With 6 distinct examiners involved, the company must manage several independent prosecution tracks, as the number of examiners equals the 6 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
§102 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KENLAW, GRACE A 1 50.8% +37.7%
DIGNAN, MICHAEL L 1 58.0% +16.4%
ESTES, JONATHAN WILLIAM 1 69.0% +6.5%
NEWMAN, DREW C 1 42.4% +28.9%
KERNS, KEVIN P 1 79.0% +21.2%
JELSMA, JONATHAN G 1 69.8% +14.9%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17746977 ENERGY STORAGE FRAME AND ENERGY STORAGE BATTERY CLUSTER JELSMA, JONATHAN G 134d overdue
17978216 BATTERY CASE AND BATTERY DEVICE NEWMAN, DREW C 34d
17984227 BATTERY PACK, ASSEMBLY METHOD FOR BATTERY PACK, AND DISASSEMBLY METHOD FOR BATTERY PACK ESTES, JONATHAN WILLIAM —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17746977 ENERGY STORAGE FRAME AND ENERGY STORAGE BATTERY CLUSTER JELSMA, JONATHAN G 134d overdue
18150793 BATTERY KENLAW, GRACE A 35d overdue
18079845 BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY PACK DIGNAN, MICHAEL L 9d overdue
17978216 BATTERY CASE AND BATTERY DEVICE NEWMAN, DREW C 34d
17971646 BATTERY, BATTERY APPARATUS AND BATTERY MANUFACTURING METHOD KERNS, KEVIN P 62d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1723 2
1725 1
1751 1
1735 1
1722 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18150793 BATTERY KENLAW, GRACE A 1723 §102 Non-Final OA 35d overdue Pending Jan 06, 2023
18079845 BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY PACK DIGNAN, MICHAEL L 1723 §103 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Dec 12, 2022
17984227 BATTERY PACK, ASSEMBLY METHOD FOR BATTERY PACK, AND DISASSEMBLY METHOD FOR BATTERY PACK ESTES, JONATHAN WILLIAM 1725 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 09, 2022
17978216 BATTERY CASE AND BATTERY DEVICE NEWMAN, DREW C 1751 §103§112 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Nov 01, 2022
17971646 BATTERY, BATTERY APPARATUS AND BATTERY MANUFACTURING METHOD KERNS, KEVIN P 1735 §103 Final Rejection 62d Pending Oct 24, 2022
17746977 ENERGY STORAGE FRAME AND ENERGY STORAGE BATTERY CLUSTER JELSMA, JONATHAN G 1722 §102§103 Non-Final OA 134d overdue Pending May 18, 2022

Managing CALB Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month