Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

9 pending office actions • 5 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. is managing 8 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 8 distinct examiners. The portfolio involves 4 distinct art units.

GRAY, RYAN M is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending action. With 8 pending office actions and 8 distinct examiners, every pending case is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution across 4 distinct art units indicates a diverse set of examiner perspectives within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.

The presence of 8 pending office actions means the company has a steady stream of prosecution work. Because there are 8 distinct examiners, practitioners cannot rely on a single relationship to resolve multiple cases. The 1 action per examiner necessitates a case-by-case approach to each office action response across the 4 art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
3
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (89%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (33%)
§101 + other3 (33%)
Double-patenting only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (22%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
22% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
44% of docket
3
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GRAY, RYAN M 1 87.6% +11.7%
TRAN, HAI 1 62.1% +31.8%
MALINOWSKI, WALTER J 1 69.9% +52.1%
BROUGHTON, KATHLEEN M 1 84.0% +10.3%
FERRER, JEDIDIAH P 1 51.9% +38.4%
MAI, KEVIN S 1 29.9% +25.8%
LIU, I JUNG 1 61.8% +33.4%
SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N 1 6.3% +8.3%
WHITAKER, ANDREW B 1 18.6% +19.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19058302 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAUSING GRAPHICAL INFORMATION TO BE RENDERED GRAY, RYAN M —

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18939762 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONFIGURABLE ORDERED TRANSFORMATION OF DATABASE CONTENT FERRER, JEDIDIAH P 45d overdue
18961567 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTHENTICATING USERS USING WEAK AUTHENTICATION TECHNIQUES, WITH DIFFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT FEATURES MALINOWSKI, WALTER J 15d
18891323 APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AND HANDLING ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR BY USERS AND OTHER ENTITIES LIU, I JUNG 20d
18365525 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LIMITING PROJECT MANAGEMENT RISK WHITAKER, ANDREW B 61d
19022409 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRADING SECURITIES USING PORTFOLIOS DEFINED BY AN ADVISOR TRAN, HAI —
18961761 METHOD, APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR EXPERIENTIAL BASED INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BROUGHTON, KATHLEEN M —
18911327 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPUTING DATABASE INTERACTIONS AND EVALUATING INTERACTION PARAMETERS MAI, KEVIN S —
18591592 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FRAMEWORK TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS AND DISPLAY THEREOF SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18939762 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONFIGURABLE ORDERED TRANSFORMATION OF DATABASE CONTENT FERRER, JEDIDIAH P 45d overdue
18961567 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTHENTICATING USERS USING WEAK AUTHENTICATION TECHNIQUES, WITH DIFFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT FEATURES MALINOWSKI, WALTER J 15d
18891323 APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AND HANDLING ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR BY USERS AND OTHER ENTITIES LIU, I JUNG 20d
18365525 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LIMITING PROJECT MANAGEMENT RISK WHITAKER, ANDREW B 61d
19058302 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAUSING GRAPHICAL INFORMATION TO BE RENDERED GRAY, RYAN M —
19022409 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRADING SECURITIES USING PORTFOLIOS DEFINED BY AN ADVISOR TRAN, HAI —
18961761 METHOD, APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR EXPERIENTIAL BASED INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BROUGHTON, KATHLEEN M —
18911327 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPUTING DATABASE INTERACTIONS AND EVALUATING INTERACTION PARAMETERS MAI, KEVIN S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3695 2
2439 1
2153 1
3624 1
3629 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19058302 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAUSING GRAPHICAL INFORMATION TO BE RENDERED GRAY, RYAN M — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 20, 2025
19022409 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRADING SECURITIES USING PORTFOLIOS DEFINED BY AN ADVISOR TRAN, HAI 3695 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2025
18961567 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTHENTICATING USERS USING WEAK AUTHENTICATION TECHNIQUES, WITH DIFFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT FEATURES MALINOWSKI, WALTER J 2439 §103§112 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Nov 27, 2024
18961761 METHOD, APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR EXPERIENTIAL BASED INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BROUGHTON, KATHLEEN M — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 27, 2024
18939762 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONFIGURABLE ORDERED TRANSFORMATION OF DATABASE CONTENT FERRER, JEDIDIAH P 2153 §101§103 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Nov 07, 2024
18911327 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPUTING DATABASE INTERACTIONS AND EVALUATING INTERACTION PARAMETERS MAI, KEVIN S — §101§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2024
18891323 APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AND HANDLING ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR BY USERS AND OTHER ENTITIES LIU, I JUNG 3695 §101 Final Rejection 20d Pending Sep 20, 2024
18591592 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FRAMEWORK TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS AND DISPLAY THEREOF SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N 3624 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
18365525 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LIMITING PROJECT MANAGEMENT RISK WHITAKER, ANDREW B 3629 §101Other Non-Final OA 61d Pending Aug 04, 2023

Managing Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month