Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Chart Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Chart Inc. currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 4 distinct examiners, which indicates that every pending matter is being handled by a different individual. This ratio between actions and examiners suggests a broad distribution of the company's intellectual property across the patent office's staff, preventing any single examiner from having an outsized influence on the entire pending portfolio.

The prosecution is further spread across 3 distinct art units, meaning that at least two of the 4 distinct examiners are likely working within the same departmental group. The busiest examiner, PETTITT, JOHN F, is currently responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because PETTITT, JOHN F holds only 1 of the 4 total actions, the workload is balanced among the 4 distinct examiners. This distribution requires the company to engage with four different examiner styles and 3 distinct art unit environments simultaneously.

The involvement of 4 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units for only 4 pending office actions reflects a diversified prosecution landscape. Practitioners must be prepared for varied feedback, as the 4 pending office actions are not concentrated under a single reviewer. The presence of PETTITT, JOHN F as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action highlights that no single examiner currently manages more than a portion of the company's active cases in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PETTITT, JOHN F 1 26.0% +21.8%
JARIWALA, CHIRAG 1 62.3% +27.3%
MOORE, ADAM DORREL 1 65.8% +40.6%
ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M 1 69.0% +37.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18321952 Cryogenic Fluid Dispensing System and Method PETTITT, JOHN F —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18158168 Dual-Purpose Cryogenic Liquid Tank System and Method MOORE, ADAM DORREL 72d overdue
18300724 CRYOGENIC PUMP JARIWALA, CHIRAG 40d
18321952 Cryogenic Fluid Dispensing System and Method PETTITT, JOHN F —
17731337 CRYOGENIC FLUID FUELING SYSTEM ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3763 2
3746 1
3700 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18321952 Cryogenic Fluid Dispensing System and Method PETTITT, JOHN F 3763 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2023
18300724 CRYOGENIC PUMP JARIWALA, CHIRAG 3746 §103 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Apr 14, 2023
18158168 Dual-Purpose Cryogenic Liquid Tank System and Method MOORE, ADAM DORREL 3763 §103 Non-Final OA 72d overdue Pending Jan 23, 2023
17731337 CRYOGENIC FLUID FUELING SYSTEM ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M 3700 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 28, 2022

Managing Chart Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month