Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Chemtreat Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

9 pending office actions • 9 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Chemtreat Inc. has 10 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are handled by 10 distinct examiners across 9 distinct art units. This high number of examiners and art units relative to the total number of actions indicates a very broad and decentralized prosecution effort.

TALBOT, BRIAN K is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. With 10 pending office actions and 10 distinct examiners, the workload is distributed so that each examiner oversees a single pending action. This lack of examiner overlap means that the company must manage multiple separate relationships and examination styles simultaneously.

The involvement of 9 distinct art units further complicates the landscape, as it suggests the portfolio touches on nearly as many different technical specialties as there are active cases. Practitioners must coordinate across these 9 distinct art units to ensure that the prosecution of one application does not negatively impact another. The diversity of examiners requires a highly organized approach to maintain consistency in claim strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (11%)
8
Medium (89%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (11%)
§103 only8 (89%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

8
Life Sciences
89% of docket
1
Information Tech
11% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TALBOT, BRIAN K 1 59.2% +30.9%
KEYWORTH, PETER 1 58.5% +23.8%
LEE, DOUGLAS 1 45.3% +13.7%
PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY 1 79.0% +20.7%
BAREFORD, KATHERINE A 1 13.9% +28.6%
UDDIN, MD I 1 77.0% +73.5%
DIGGS, TANISHA 1 55.1% +54.1%
FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M 1 45.6% +35.4%
GOLOBOY, JAMES C 1 63.7% +8.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18615007 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATING METAL SURFACES IN SURFACE PREPARATION PROCESSES BAREFORD, KATHERINE A 4d overdue
18584647 ITERATIVE PROMPT TRAINER AND REPORT GENERATOR UDDIN, MD I 28d

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18917286 METHODS OF PROTECTING FURNACE ELECTRODES WITH COOLING LIQUID THAT CONTAINS AN ADDITIVE TALBOT, BRIAN K 19d overdue
18615007 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATING METAL SURFACES IN SURFACE PREPARATION PROCESSES BAREFORD, KATHERINE A 4d overdue
17673987 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR EVALUATING ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS IN WATER FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M 14d
18584647 ITERATIVE PROMPT TRAINER AND REPORT GENERATOR UDDIN, MD I 28d
18776774 ENHANCED INORGANIC COAGULANTS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT KEYWORTH, PETER —
18671057 METHOD OF OFFLINE CLEANING OF COOLING SYSTEMS LEE, DOUGLAS —
18618495 ACIDIC WASTEWATER PH NEUTRALIZATION WITH MICRONIZED CALCIUM CARBONATE PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY —
18381397 METHOD FOR INHIBITING CORROSION USING AQUEOUS DISPERSION OF ALKYL BIS AMIDE DIGGS, TANISHA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1712 1
1777 1
1714 1
1779 1
1718 1
2169 1
1761 1
1758 1
1771 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18917286 METHODS OF PROTECTING FURNACE ELECTRODES WITH COOLING LIQUID THAT CONTAINS AN ADDITIVE TALBOT, BRIAN K 1712 §103 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Oct 16, 2024
18776774 ENHANCED INORGANIC COAGULANTS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT KEYWORTH, PETER 1777 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 18, 2024
18671057 METHOD OF OFFLINE CLEANING OF COOLING SYSTEMS LEE, DOUGLAS 1714 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 22, 2024
18618495 ACIDIC WASTEWATER PH NEUTRALIZATION WITH MICRONIZED CALCIUM CARBONATE PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY 1779 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 27, 2024
18615007 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATING METAL SURFACES IN SURFACE PREPARATION PROCESSES BAREFORD, KATHERINE A 1718 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Mar 25, 2024
18584647 ITERATIVE PROMPT TRAINER AND REPORT GENERATOR UDDIN, MD I 2169 §101§103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Feb 22, 2024
18381397 METHOD FOR INHIBITING CORROSION USING AQUEOUS DISPERSION OF ALKYL BIS AMIDE DIGGS, TANISHA 1761 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 18, 2023
17673987 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR EVALUATING ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS IN WATER FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M 1758 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Feb 17, 2022
17138073 CORROSION CONTROL OF STAINLESS STEELS IN WATER SYSTEMS USING TIN CORROSION INHIBITOR WITH A HYDROXYCARBOXYLIC ACID GOLOBOY, JAMES C 1771 §103 Final Rejection 51d overdue Pending Dec 30, 2020

Managing Chemtreat Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Chemtreat Inc. have?

Chemtreat Inc. has 9 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 9 art units and 9 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Chemtreat Inc. applications?

Brian K Talbot has the most, with 1 of Chemtreat Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Chemtreat Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month