Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Chyurn Shan International Co. Ltd. manages a patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution status is currently marked by 1 pending office action. This single active matter suggests that the company is focusing its current legal resources on a specific chemical or material science innovation. This targeted approach indicates a prioritized effort to secure rights for a particular technical advancement.
The examination of these filings is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This arrangement indicates that the subject matter is being reviewed by a single specialized division within the patent office. The lack of diversity in examiners and art units suggests a specific technical focus for the company current intellectual property efforts, which can lead to a more predictable prosecution timeline.
LEE, JOHN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. This examiner represents the sole point of contact for the company active prosecution. Because the busiest examiner pending count is 1, the entire active workload is concentrated with this one official, making their specific examination tendencies and art unit standards the critical factors for the company success.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, JOHN | 1 | 30.0% | +39.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1794 | 1 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial