Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Columbus Mckinnon Corporation

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (25%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§112 only1 (25%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 2 71.8% +19.7%
MORELLO, JEAN F 1 69.4% +9.4%
WEBER, GREGORY ROBERT 1 76.3% +15.6%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18232904 Low Headroom Hook Block for Wire Rope Hoist ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 132d overdue
18386745 Linear Actuator with an Integrated Variable Frequency Device WEBER, GREGORY ROBERT 73d overdue
18232911 Wire Rope Hoist With Swivel Sheave ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 2d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3654 2
2855 1
3618 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18592655 Load Sensing Device for a Hoist MORELLO, JEAN F 2855 §103 Non-Final OA 36d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2024
18386745 Linear Actuator with an Integrated Variable Frequency Device WEBER, GREGORY ROBERT 3618 Other Non-Final OA 73d overdue Pending Nov 03, 2023
18232904 Low Headroom Hook Block for Wire Rope Hoist ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 3654 §112 Non-Final OA 132d overdue Pending Aug 11, 2023
18232911 Wire Rope Hoist With Swivel Sheave ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 3654 §103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Aug 11, 2023

Managing Columbus Mckinnon Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month