Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Comadur SA

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

9 pending office actions • 6 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Comadur SA is active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company currently manages 7 pending office actions. These matters are spread across 7 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, showing a decentralized prosecution landscape with some clustering at the art unit level.

WALKER, MICHAEL JAMES is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for 1 pending office action. The distribution of 7 actions among 7 distinct examiners indicates that no single examiner has a concentrated workload for this company. This means the company must navigate 7 different examiner perspectives to move its current applications forward.

The involvement of 5 distinct art units for 7 pending office actions suggests that while the examiners are all different, some of them are working within the same technical groups. This could provide some consistency in the technical standards applied to the applications. However, with 7 distinct examiners, practitioners still need to be mindful of individual differences in examination style across the 7 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (11%)
2
Easy (22%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (11%)
§112 only2 (22%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
44% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
33% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
22% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MORGAN, EMILY M 1 35.7% +33.2%
WALKER, MICHAEL JAMES 1 89.7% -4.4%
KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP 1 69.9% +22.1%
SONG, MATTHEW J 1 60.4% +13.9%
RUFO, RYAN C 1 59.0% +40.8%
HIGGINS, GERARD T 1 63.3% +39.4%
BRATLAND JR, KENNETH A 1 56.2% +16.3%
AFZALI, SARANG 1 73.5% +44.8%
LUEBKE, RENEE S 1 42.1% +10.0%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19203247 BRACELET FOR A WATCH OR FOR AN ITEM OF JEWELLERY, FORMED BY AN ASSEMBLY OF LINKS MORGAN, EMILY M —
19068682 ITEM WITH A PLIQUE-À-JOUR ENAMEL DECORATION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME WALKER, MICHAEL JAMES —
18809479 WATERTIGHT WATCH CASE KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP —
18754569 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A CUTTING TOOL WITH LUBRICATION ORIFICES OF COMPLEX SHAPES AND CUTTING TOOL WITH LUBRICATION ORIFICES OF COMPLEX SHAPES RUFO, RYAN C —
18154076 EXTERNAL PART COMPONENT OF A WATCH OR OF A FASHION OR JEWELLERY ITEM AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUCH AN EXTERNAL PART COMPONENT HIGGINS, GERARD T —
17657660 METHOD FOR INJECTING A DECORATED ITEM AFZALI, SARANG —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19203247 BRACELET FOR A WATCH OR FOR AN ITEM OF JEWELLERY, FORMED BY AN ASSEMBLY OF LINKS MORGAN, EMILY M —
18809479 WATERTIGHT WATCH CASE KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP —
18766019 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAPPHIRE BARS SONG, MATTHEW J —
18754569 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A CUTTING TOOL WITH LUBRICATION ORIFICES OF COMPLEX SHAPES AND CUTTING TOOL WITH LUBRICATION ORIFICES OF COMPLEX SHAPES RUFO, RYAN C —
18154076 EXTERNAL PART COMPONENT OF A WATCH OR OF A FASHION OR JEWELLERY ITEM AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUCH AN EXTERNAL PART COMPONENT HIGGINS, GERARD T —
17970180 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MONOCRYSTALLINE SAPPHIRE SEED AS WELL AS A SAPPHIRE SINGLE-CRYSTAL WITH A PREFERRED CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC ORIENTATION AND EXTERNAL PART AND FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS FOR WATCHMAKING AND JEWELLERY BRATLAND JR, KENNETH A —
17657660 METHOD FOR INJECTING A DECORATED ITEM AFZALI, SARANG —
17492927 ITEM MADE FROM CERMET AND/OR CERAMIC LUEBKE, RENEE S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2831 3
1714 2
3677 1
1742 1
1785 1
3726 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19203247 BRACELET FOR A WATCH OR FOR AN ITEM OF JEWELLERY, FORMED BY AN ASSEMBLY OF LINKS MORGAN, EMILY M 3677 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 09, 2025
19068682 ITEM WITH A PLIQUE-À-JOUR ENAMEL DECORATION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME WALKER, MICHAEL JAMES 2831 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 03, 2025
18809479 WATERTIGHT WATCH CASE KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP 2831 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 20, 2024
18766019 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAPPHIRE BARS SONG, MATTHEW J 1714 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 08, 2024
18754569 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A CUTTING TOOL WITH LUBRICATION ORIFICES OF COMPLEX SHAPES AND CUTTING TOOL WITH LUBRICATION ORIFICES OF COMPLEX SHAPES RUFO, RYAN C 1742 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 26, 2024
18154076 EXTERNAL PART COMPONENT OF A WATCH OR OF A FASHION OR JEWELLERY ITEM AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUCH AN EXTERNAL PART COMPONENT HIGGINS, GERARD T 1785 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 13, 2023
17970180 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MONOCRYSTALLINE SAPPHIRE SEED AS WELL AS A SAPPHIRE SINGLE-CRYSTAL WITH A PREFERRED CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC ORIENTATION AND EXTERNAL PART AND FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS FOR WATCHMAKING AND JEWELLERY BRATLAND JR, KENNETH A 1714 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 20, 2022
17657660 METHOD FOR INJECTING A DECORATED ITEM AFZALI, SARANG 3726 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 01, 2022
17492927 ITEM MADE FROM CERMET AND/OR CERAMIC LUEBKE, RENEE S 2831 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2021

Managing Comadur SA's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Comadur SA have?

Comadur SA has 9 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 9 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Comadur SA applications?

Emily M Morgan has the most, with 1 of Comadur SA's pending office actions.

What technology area are Comadur SA's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month