Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

11 pending office actions • 10 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 26 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft has 11 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The matters span 10 distinct examiners and 9 distinct art units, indicating broad distribution with some repeated assignment.

CARDOSO, JUSTIN ALEXANDER is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. The docket calls for both matter-specific examiner preparation and coordination across the art-unit groupings that recur in the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
5
Medium (45%)
1
Easy (9%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (18%)
§101 + other2 (18%)
§103 only5 (45%)
§112 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (9%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
27% of docket
2
Communications
18% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
55% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CARDOSO, JUSTIN ALEXANDER 2 — —
AKHAVANNIK, HADI 1 85.9% +13.1%
DARDANO, STEFANO ANTHONY 1 78.7% +32.0%
OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 1 16.1% +13.9%
ANFINRUD, GABRIEL P 1 42.0% +25.7%
BOLEN, NICHOLAS D 1 9.4% +10.0%
BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 1 54.4% +38.3%
REINBOLD, SCOTT A 1 69.3% +12.7%
BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y 1 75.5% +10.3%
FRENCH, CORRELL T 1 45.3% +33.9%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19002868 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING RACE TRACK IMPERFECTIONS USING MACHINE LEARNING AKHAVANNIK, HADI —
18895693 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING COURSES GENERATED USING MACHINE LEARNING INTO A CURRICULUM OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF —
18434201 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING DIGITAL CONTENT BASED ON USER ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BOLEN, NICHOLAS D —
18474665 DATA-DRIVEN METHOD FOR DISCOVERING CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES IN PHYSICAL SYSTEMS BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y —
18357636 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACTIVE ASSESSMENT OF A USER PROFILE BASED ON TRAINING MATERIAL FRENCH, CORRELL T —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18417553 MODEL PREDICTIVE PATH INTEGRAL CONTROLLER GUIDED BY LARGE VISION LANGUAGE MODEL FOR INTELLIGENT AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE PATH PLANNING BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 17d overdue
18533846 OPTIMAL SLIP ANGLE STEERING CONTROL FOR VEHICLES REINBOLD, SCOTT A 7d
19002868 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING RACE TRACK IMPERFECTIONS USING MACHINE LEARNING AKHAVANNIK, HADI —
18946021 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING NEURAL NETWORKS TO IDENTIFY AND GEOLOCATE RACERS ON A RACE COURSE DARDANO, STEFANO ANTHONY —
18895693 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING COURSES GENERATED USING MACHINE LEARNING INTO A CURRICULUM OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF —
18784071 LOCAL PLANNING FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES USING MULTIPLE CAMERAS ANFINRUD, GABRIEL P —
18434201 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING DIGITAL CONTENT BASED ON USER ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BOLEN, NICHOLAS D —
18474665 DATA-DRIVEN METHOD FOR DISCOVERING CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES IN PHYSICAL SYSTEMS BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2143 2
2676 1
2663 1
3622 1
3662 1
3624 1
3665 1
3747 1
2156 1
3715 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19002868 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING RACE TRACK IMPERFECTIONS USING MACHINE LEARNING AKHAVANNIK, HADI 2676 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2024
18946021 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING NEURAL NETWORKS TO IDENTIFY AND GEOLOCATE RACERS ON A RACE COURSE DARDANO, STEFANO ANTHONY 2663 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18895693 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING COURSES GENERATED USING MACHINE LEARNING INTO A CURRICULUM OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 3622 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 25, 2024
18784071 LOCAL PLANNING FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES USING MULTIPLE CAMERAS ANFINRUD, GABRIEL P 3662 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2024
18434201 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING DIGITAL CONTENT BASED ON USER ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BOLEN, NICHOLAS D 3624 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 06, 2024
18417553 MODEL PREDICTIVE PATH INTEGRAL CONTROLLER GUIDED BY LARGE VISION LANGUAGE MODEL FOR INTELLIGENT AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE PATH PLANNING BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Jan 19, 2024
18533846 OPTIMAL SLIP ANGLE STEERING CONTROL FOR VEHICLES REINBOLD, SCOTT A 3747 §112 Final Rejection 7d Pending Dec 08, 2023
18474665 DATA-DRIVEN METHOD FOR DISCOVERING CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES IN PHYSICAL SYSTEMS BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y 2156 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 26, 2023
18357636 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACTIVE ASSESSMENT OF A USER PROFILE BASED ON TRAINING MATERIAL FRENCH, CORRELL T 3715 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2023
18322309 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY IDENTIFYING OUTLIERS IN A MACHINE LEARNING TRAINING DATASET CARDOSO, JUSTIN ALEXANDER 2143 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 23, 2023
18322316 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY AUGMENTING MACHINE LEARNING TRAINING DATASET BY USING DEEP GENERATIVE MODELS CARDOSO, JUSTIN ALEXANDER 2143 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 23, 2023

Managing Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft have?

Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft has 11 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 10 art units and 10 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft applications?

Justin Alexander Cardoso has the most, with 2 of Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft's pending office actions.

What technology area are Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month