Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, THUY N | 1 | 57.6% | +23.9% |
| BROWN, LUIS A | 1 | 45.9% | +30.6% |
| MILEF, ELDA G | 1 | 40.5% | +8.0% |
| TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN | 1 | 28.4% | +39.0% |
| ANDERSON, SCOTT C | 1 | 58.3% | +31.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18895362 | PLATFORM FOR MANAGEMENT OF USER DATA UTILIZING A DATA PLATFORM | NGUYEN, THUY N | 35d overdue |
| 18312959 | PLATFORM AND METHOD FOR TOKENIZED ACCREDITATION | TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN | 28d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18895362 | PLATFORM FOR MANAGEMENT OF USER DATA UTILIZING A DATA PLATFORM | NGUYEN, THUY N | 35d overdue |
| 18491560 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF FUNDRAISING FOR A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN | BROWN, LUIS A | 35d overdue |
| 17842265 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TOKENIZED AFFILIATE MARKETING | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | 8d overdue |
| 18312959 | PLATFORM AND METHOD FOR TOKENIZED ACCREDITATION | TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3694 | 2 |
| 3622 | 1 |
| 3626 | 1 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18895362 | PLATFORM FOR MANAGEMENT OF USER DATA UTILIZING A DATA PLATFORM | NGUYEN, THUY N | 3622 | §101 | Final Rejection | 35d overdue | Pending | Sep 24, 2024 |
| 18491560 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF FUNDRAISING FOR A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN | BROWN, LUIS A | 3626 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 35d overdue | Pending | Oct 20, 2023 |
| 18491119 | METHOD FOR MONETIZING DATA FOR A RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION | MILEF, ELDA G | 3694 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Oct 20, 2023 |
| 18312959 | PLATFORM AND METHOD FOR TOKENIZED ACCREDITATION | TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN | 3625 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | May 05, 2023 |
| 17842265 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TOKENIZED AFFILIATE MARKETING | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | 3694 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Jun 16, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial