Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Databricks Inc.

8 pending office actions • 8 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 41 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (12%)
6
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (12%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§103 only6 (75%)
No statute on record1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
75% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
12% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALGIBHAH, MAHER N 1 88.0% +18.6%
HUANG, BRYAN PAI SONG 1 81.0% +1.8%
CHEUNG, HUBERT G 1 63.1% +49.3%
VAZ, JANICE EZVI 1 75.8% +19.4%
BOYCE, ANDRE D 1 36.0% +19.2%
AQUINO, WYNUEL S 1 78.8% +20.4%
BARRETT, RYAN S 1 64.6% +43.2%
TAN, DAVID H 1 31.3% +17.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19030032 Query Watchdog HUANG, BRYAN PAI SONG 13d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19249957 MULTI-CLUSTER QUERY RESULT CACHING ALGIBHAH, MAHER N 84d

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17587793 OPTIMIZATION OF TUNING FOR MODELS USED FOR MULTIPLE PREDICTION GENERATION TAN, DAVID H 38d overdue
18612603 MECHANISM FOR AUTOMATED DETERMINATION AND EXCHANGE OF TRUST CREDENTIALS FOR COMPUTATIONAL DECISION SYSTEMS BOYCE, ANDRE D 31d overdue
18206460 FEATURE FUNCTION BASED COMPUTATION OF ON-DEMAND FEATURES OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS BARRETT, RYAN S 8d overdue
18653469 GENERATING SYNTHETIC CAPTIONS FOR TRAINING TEXT-TO-IMAGE GENERATIVE MODELS VAZ, JANICE EZVI 4d overdue
18368919 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT WITH INTERMEDIARY NODE IN KUBERNETES ENVIRONMENT AQUINO, WYNUEL S 1d overdue
19249957 MULTI-CLUSTER QUERY RESULT CACHING ALGIBHAH, MAHER N 84d
19000466 EVALUATING EXPRESSIONS OVER DICTIONARY DATA CHEUNG, HUBERT G 84d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2161 1
2114 1
2152 1
2667 1
3623 1
2199 1
2148 1
2145 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19249957 MULTI-CLUSTER QUERY RESULT CACHING ALGIBHAH, MAHER N 2161 §101 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Jun 25, 2025
19030032 Query Watchdog HUANG, BRYAN PAI SONG 2114 §103 Non-Final OA 13d Pending Jan 17, 2025
19000466 EVALUATING EXPRESSIONS OVER DICTIONARY DATA CHEUNG, HUBERT G 2152 §103 Final Rejection 84d Pending Dec 23, 2024
18653469 GENERATING SYNTHETIC CAPTIONS FOR TRAINING TEXT-TO-IMAGE GENERATIVE MODELS VAZ, JANICE EZVI 2667 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending May 02, 2024
18612603 MECHANISM FOR AUTOMATED DETERMINATION AND EXCHANGE OF TRUST CREDENTIALS FOR COMPUTATIONAL DECISION SYSTEMS BOYCE, ANDRE D 3623 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Mar 21, 2024
18368919 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT WITH INTERMEDIARY NODE IN KUBERNETES ENVIRONMENT AQUINO, WYNUEL S 2199 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Sep 15, 2023
18206460 FEATURE FUNCTION BASED COMPUTATION OF ON-DEMAND FEATURES OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS BARRETT, RYAN S 2148 Other Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Jun 06, 2023
17587793 OPTIMIZATION OF TUNING FOR MODELS USED FOR MULTIPLE PREDICTION GENERATION TAN, DAVID H 2145 §103 Final Rejection 38d overdue Pending Jan 28, 2022

Managing Databricks Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month