Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Denali Therapeutics Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

7 pending office actions • 4 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Denali Therapeutics Inc. is navigating 7 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are handled by 7 distinct examiners, which shows a distributed prosecution landscape where no examiner is managing multiple pending files simultaneously. The portfolio spans 4 distinct art units, reflecting a range of biotechnological or pharmaceutical claims that require specialized review across different USPTO divisions.

The busiest examiner identified is COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY, who accounts for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given the total volume of actions, the workload is split among the various examiners. This distribution suggests that the prosecution strategy must be adapted for different individual examiner styles across the 4 distinct art units involved. The breadth of 4 distinct art units indicates that the company's intellectual property covers several specialized sub-sectors within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
4
Medium (57%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (29%)
§112 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting + other2 (29%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
71% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY 1 74.9% +15.5%
JACKSON, SHAWQUIA 1 78.0% -3.3%
LU, CHENG 1 54.1% +64.1%
CHANDRA, GYAN 1 71.3% +27.5%
LIPPERT, JOHN WILLIAM 1 58.2% +40.0%
AEDER, SEAN E 1 57.0% +19.9%
SHUPE, ELIZABETH A 1 66.2% +44.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18276823 ANTI-TRANSFERRIN RECEPTOR FUSION PROTEINS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF LU, CHENG 46d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17178595 ANTI-HER2 POLYPEPTIDES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF SHUPE, ELIZABETH A 79d overdue
17797644 METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HUNTER SYNDROME CHANDRA, GYAN 37d overdue
17296506 METHODS FOR TREATING DYSREGULATED LIPID METABOLISM AEDER, SEAN E 15d overdue
18276823 ANTI-TRANSFERRIN RECEPTOR FUSION PROTEINS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF LU, CHENG 46d
17614842 MODIFIED RELEASE FORMULATION OF A PYRIMIDINYLAMINO-PYRAZOLE COMPOUND, AND METHODS OF TREATMENT LIPPERT, JOHN WILLIAM 62d
18889058 Kinase Inhibitors and Uses Thereof COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1642 2
1674 1
1615 1
1643 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18889058 Kinase Inhibitors and Uses Thereof COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2024
18812872 COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS JACKSON, SHAWQUIA — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18276823 ANTI-TRANSFERRIN RECEPTOR FUSION PROTEINS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF LU, CHENG 1642 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA 46d Pending Aug 10, 2023
17797644 METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HUNTER SYNDROME CHANDRA, GYAN 1674 §103DP Final Rejection 37d overdue Pending Aug 04, 2022
17614842 MODIFIED RELEASE FORMULATION OF A PYRIMIDINYLAMINO-PYRAZOLE COMPOUND, AND METHODS OF TREATMENT LIPPERT, JOHN WILLIAM 1615 §103 Final Rejection 62d Pending Nov 29, 2021
17296506 METHODS FOR TREATING DYSREGULATED LIPID METABOLISM AEDER, SEAN E 1642 §103 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending May 24, 2021
17178595 ANTI-HER2 POLYPEPTIDES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF SHUPE, ELIZABETH A 1643 §103DP Non-Final OA 79d overdue Pending Feb 18, 2021

Managing Denali Therapeutics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month