Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

DocuSign Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

22 pending office actions • 17 art units • 20 examiners • 0 of 22 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 34 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

DocuSign Inc. is currently managing 22 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These matters are distributed among 20 distinct examiners. This indicates that the 22 pending actions are spread widely across the examining corps, with very little consolidation of cases under individual examiners. This broad distribution suggests that the company's software innovations are being reviewed by a diverse group of examiners, each bringing their own perspective to the technical merits of the applications.

The company's prosecution activity spans 17 distinct art units. With 22 pending office actions, the company's presence in 17 art units shows that its software innovations are being reviewed by a diverse range of specialized groups. This broad distribution across 17 units reflects the varied technical aspects of the company's filings. The ratio of 22 actions to 17 art units indicates that most units are handling only one or two cases, further emphasizing the wide technical reach of the company's current patent portfolio.

NICHOLAS HASTY is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 2 pending office actions. This workload of 2 actions is the maximum for any of the 20 distinct examiners. The management of 22 pending actions across 17 art units underscores the company's active engagement in the patenting process for its computing technologies. This structure requires the company to maintain a flexible and comprehensive approach to prosecution across a large number of different examiners and specialized art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

22
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
13
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (55%)
9
Medium (41%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (14%)
§101 + other8 (36%)
§103 only9 (41%)
§112 only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (5%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
14
Information Tech
64% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
27% of docket
2
Business / Other
9% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

220 h
Manual time on pending OAs
44 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
77 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HASTY, NICHOLAS 2 51.7% +32.2%
ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 2 9.5% +15.8%
ZHANG, DUAN 1 60.8% +18.6%
LE, HUNG D 1 90.1% +6.4%
BROWN, LUIS A 1 46.2% +31.3%
MALINOWSKI, WALTER J 1 69.9% +52.1%
ALLEN, NICHOLAS E 1 75.6% +14.6%
HOANG, HAU HAI 1 78.2% +13.4%
SKHOUN, HICHAM 1 77.1% +5.5%
JARRETT, SCOTT L 1 52.0% +47.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19194434 MACHINE LEARNED MODEL FOR CONTRACT GENERATION IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM LE, HUNG D 39d

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17895427 USING MACHINE LEARNING TO IDENTIFY LEGAL OBLIGATIONS IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 139d overdue
18129194 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM TO MANAGE A DOCUMENT COLLECTION HAN, BYUNGKWON 31d overdue
19093083 AGREEMENT DOCUMENT EXECUTION BASED ON DOCUMENT MODEL IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BROWN, LUIS A 18d overdue
17829293 PREDICTIVE TEXT FOR CONTRACT GENERATION IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 22d
19418458 WEB-BASED WALLET AUTHENTICATION ZHANG, DUAN —
19042984 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A HYBRID CONTRACT EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT ALLEN, NICHOLAS E —
19040064 AUTOMATIC REVISIONS TO DOCUMENT CLAUSES BASED ON CLAUSE TYPE HOANG, HAU HAI —
18964196 MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) CLAUSES IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS JARRETT, SCOTT L —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17895427 USING MACHINE LEARNING TO IDENTIFY LEGAL OBLIGATIONS IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 139d overdue
18175915 AGREEMENT ORCHESTRATION HASTY, NICHOLAS 31d overdue
19093083 AGREEMENT DOCUMENT EXECUTION BASED ON DOCUMENT MODEL IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BROWN, LUIS A 18d overdue
17829293 PREDICTIVE TEXT FOR CONTRACT GENERATION IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 22d
19418458 WEB-BASED WALLET AUTHENTICATION ZHANG, DUAN —
19066777 DELEGATED SIGNING USING SENSITIVITY CLASSIFICATION MALINOWSKI, WALTER J —
19042984 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A HYBRID CONTRACT EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT ALLEN, NICHOLAS E —
19040064 AUTOMATIC REVISIONS TO DOCUMENT CLAUSES BASED ON CLAUSE TYPE HOANG, HAU HAI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3629 3
2154 2
2141 2
3699 1
2161 1
3626 1
2164 1
3625 1
2433 1
2178 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19418458 WEB-BASED WALLET AUTHENTICATION ZHANG, DUAN 3699 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2025
19194434 MACHINE LEARNED MODEL FOR CONTRACT GENERATION IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM LE, HUNG D 2161 §103Other Final Rejection 39d Pending Apr 30, 2025
19093083 AGREEMENT DOCUMENT EXECUTION BASED ON DOCUMENT MODEL IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BROWN, LUIS A 3626 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 18d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2025
19066777 DELEGATED SIGNING USING SENSITIVITY CLASSIFICATION MALINOWSKI, WALTER J — §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2025
19042984 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A HYBRID CONTRACT EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT ALLEN, NICHOLAS E 2154 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 31, 2025
19040064 AUTOMATIC REVISIONS TO DOCUMENT CLAUSES BASED ON CLAUSE TYPE HOANG, HAU HAI 2154 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 29, 2025
19037654 TRIGGERING EXECUTION OF MACHINE LEARNING BASED PREDICTION OF DOCUMENT METADATA SKHOUN, HICHAM 2164 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jan 27, 2025
18964196 MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) CLAUSES IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS JARRETT, SCOTT L 3625 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 29, 2024
18961844 CONTENT BASED DOCUMENT ACCESS SHAAWAT, MAYASA A. 2433 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 27, 2024
18820639 DYNAMIC SPLITTING AND MERGING OF AGENTS IN DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS BARNES JR, CARL E 2178 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18420219 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE EXTRACTION ORR, HENRY W 2100 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 23, 2024
18420445 DOCUMENT GENERATION RULES FIBBI, CHRISTOPHER J 2174 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 23, 2024
18512524 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMANCE MONITORING LIE, ANGELA M 3992 §112 Final Rejection 87d overdue Pending Nov 17, 2023
18129194 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM TO MANAGE A DOCUMENT COLLECTION HAN, BYUNGKWON 2121 §101§103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Mar 31, 2023
18194345 COMPARISON OF NAMES LIN, ALLEN S 2153 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 31, 2023
18175915 AGREEMENT ORCHESTRATION HASTY, NICHOLAS 2141 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Feb 28, 2023
18097009 MACHINE LEARNING BASED PREDICTION OF DOCUMENT METADATA NGUYEN, CHAU T 2145 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jan 13, 2023
17956456 GENERATING DOCUMENT TEMPLATES IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM HASTY, NICHOLAS 2141 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 29, 2022
17895427 USING MACHINE LEARNING TO IDENTIFY LEGAL OBLIGATIONS IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 3629 §101§102 Non-Final OA 139d overdue Pending Aug 25, 2022
17829293 PREDICTIVE TEXT FOR CONTRACT GENERATION IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 3629 §101§103 Final Rejection 22d Pending May 31, 2022
17727710 AUTOMATIC TEMPLATE GENERATION WITH INBUILT TEMPLATE LOGIC INTERFACE FABER, DAVID 2172 §103 Final Rejection 55d Pending Apr 23, 2022
17586783 DOCUMENT ANALYZER FOR RISK ASSESSMENT LAKHANI, ANDREW C 3629 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 28, 2022

Managing DocuSign Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month