Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Dspace GmbH

Technology area: Computing & Software

22 pending office actions • 16 art units • 22 examiners • 0 of 22 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 31 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Dspace GmbH has 23 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The actions are assigned to 23 distinct examiners and 17 distinct art units, showing complete examiner dispersion across a broader set of art-unit assignments.

KHALID, OMER is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. No individual examiner accounts for multiple listed actions, so a centralized response template may need adjustment for each examination record. The repeated art-unit assignments may nevertheless justify tracking recurring eligibility, prior-art, and claim-construction issues across related matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

22
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
9
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

14
Hard (64%)
7
Medium (32%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other7 (32%)
§103 only7 (32%)
§112 only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (32%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
14
Information Tech
64% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
3
Semiconductors
14% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
1
Business / Other
5% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

220 h
Manual time on pending OAs
44 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
77 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FIN, CAROLYN 1 61.7% +30.1%
CHEN, CHIA-LING 1 52.5% +40.3%
RATCLIFFE, LUKE D 1 87.2% +10.4%
OMETZ, DAVID LOUIS 1 76.2% -8.8%
TRAN, JOSHUA VAN 1 100.0% +0.0%
KABIR, MOHAMMAD H 1 67.7% +14.1%
LEE, MARINA 1 85.7% +17.9%
ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA 1 69.1% +19.5%
GOOD, KENNETH W 1 73.7% +18.7%
HEBERT, THEODORE E 1 74.2% +14.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18667582 RESOURCE-OPTIMIZED PARAMETER VARIATION OF SCENARIOS LEE, MARINA —

Hard Cases (14)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18593244 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR TESTING THE EXECUTION OF AT LEAST ONE CONTROL UNIT FUNCTION ON A SIMULATOR, AND CORRESPONDING SIMULATOR HEBERT, THEODORE E 38d overdue
17996950 SIMULATION METHOD FOR A PIXEL HEADLAMP SYSTEM LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN 2d overdue
18075791 METHOD FOR DETERMINING SIMILAR SCENARIOS, TRAINING METHOD, AND TRAINING CONTROLLER SHALABY, AHMAD HUSSAM 27d
17996508 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A TOTAL LIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF A PIXEL SPOTLIGHT GIRI, PURSOTTAM 33d
18216936 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR THE ANALYSIS OF TEST PROCEDURES FORRISTALL, JOSHUA L 41d
17778724 Method for Providing an Explanation Dataset for an AI Module, Computer-Readable Storage Medium, Device and System MANG, VAN C 56d
18916632 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A LIDAR SENSOR CHEN, CHIA-LING —
18916625 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A LIDAR SENSOR RATCLIFFE, LUKE D —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18593244 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR TESTING THE EXECUTION OF AT LEAST ONE CONTROL UNIT FUNCTION ON A SIMULATOR, AND CORRESPONDING SIMULATOR HEBERT, THEODORE E 38d overdue
18950838 TEST ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR STIMULATING AN INFRARED CAMERA-BASED SURROUNDINGS DETECTION SYSTEM FIN, CAROLYN —
18916632 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A LIDAR SENSOR CHEN, CHIA-LING —
18916625 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A LIDAR SENSOR RATCLIFFE, LUKE D —
18771641 METHOD FOR FPGA BUILD AND INITIALIZATION KABIR, MOHAMMAD H —
18667582 RESOURCE-OPTIMIZED PARAMETER VARIATION OF SCENARIOS LEE, MARINA —
18664932 TEST ARRANGEMENT FOR TESTING A SURROUNDINGS SENSOR AND METHOD FOR TESTING A SURROUNDINGS SENSOR ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA —
18621356 SIMULATOR FOR THE SIMULATION OF A DISTANCE FOR SENSORS, METHOD FOR OPERATING SUCH A SIMULATOR AND A DELAY SECTION FOR SUCH A SIMULATOR GOOD, KENNETH W —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2192 3
2187 3
3645 2
2884 1
2672 1
3648 1
2199 1
2193 1
2189 1
2857 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18950838 TEST ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR STIMULATING AN INFRARED CAMERA-BASED SURROUNDINGS DETECTION SYSTEM FIN, CAROLYN 2884 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18916632 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A LIDAR SENSOR CHEN, CHIA-LING 3645 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18916625 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A LIDAR SENSOR RATCLIFFE, LUKE D 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18882540 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY ANNOTATING SENSOR DATA OMETZ, DAVID LOUIS 2672 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2024
18828944 METHOD FOR CREATING A CONTROL PROGRAM FOR A TARGET PLATFORM, DEVICE FOR DATA PROCESSING, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND DATA MEDIUM TRAN, JOSHUA VAN 2192 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 09, 2024
18771641 METHOD FOR FPGA BUILD AND INITIALIZATION KABIR, MOHAMMAD H 2192 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 12, 2024
18667582 RESOURCE-OPTIMIZED PARAMETER VARIATION OF SCENARIOS LEE, MARINA 2192 §112 Final Rejection — Pending May 17, 2024
18664932 TEST ARRANGEMENT FOR TESTING A SURROUNDINGS SENSOR AND METHOD FOR TESTING A SURROUNDINGS SENSOR ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 15, 2024
18621356 SIMULATOR FOR THE SIMULATION OF A DISTANCE FOR SENSORS, METHOD FOR OPERATING SUCH A SIMULATOR AND A DELAY SECTION FOR SUCH A SIMULATOR GOOD, KENNETH W 3648 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 29, 2024
18593244 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR TESTING THE EXECUTION OF AT LEAST ONE CONTROL UNIT FUNCTION ON A SIMULATOR, AND CORRESPONDING SIMULATOR HEBERT, THEODORE E 2199 §101§103 Final Rejection 38d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2024
18232923 METHOD FOR MODIFYING A SIGNAL PROCESSING CHAIN VU, TUAN A 2193 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 11, 2023
18216924 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING A VIRTUAL TEST HAGLER, JOHN DAVID 2189 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 30, 2023
18216936 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR THE ANALYSIS OF TEST PROCEDURES FORRISTALL, JOSHUA L 2857 §101§103 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Jun 30, 2023
18190187 VIRTUAL TRAINING METHOD FOR A NEURAL NETWORK FOR ACTUATING A TECHNICAL DEVICE SHELTON, SETH CAPRIANO-UMA 2141 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2023
18187696 OPTICAL UNIT, TEST SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN OPTICAL UNIT BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 2877 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 22, 2023
18075791 METHOD FOR DETERMINING SIMILAR SCENARIOS, TRAINING METHOD, AND TRAINING CONTROLLER SHALABY, AHMAD HUSSAM 2187 §103§112 Final Rejection 27d Pending Dec 06, 2022
18070968 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SIMULATING A CONTROL PROGRAM COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD 2188 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 29, 2022
17996950 SIMULATION METHOD FOR A PIXEL HEADLAMP SYSTEM LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN 2187 §101§103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Oct 24, 2022
17996508 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A TOTAL LIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF A PIXEL SPOTLIGHT GIRI, PURSOTTAM 2186 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection 33d Pending Oct 19, 2022
17954063 METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR SIMULATING THE MOTION OF A ROTATABLE BODY PIERRE LOUIS, ANDRE 2187 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 27, 2022
17778724 Method for Providing an Explanation Dataset for an AI Module, Computer-Readable Storage Medium, Device and System MANG, VAN C 2126 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 56d Pending May 20, 2022
17525376 REMOVING LESS INFORMATIVE SAMPLES IN SEQUENTIAL DATA HAN, JOSEP 2122 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 12, 2021

Managing Dspace GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Dspace GmbH have?

Dspace GmbH has 22 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 16 art units and 22 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Dspace GmbH applications?

Carolyn Fin has the most, with 1 of Dspace GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Dspace GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month