Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Epinovatech AB

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Epinovatech AB has 1 pending office action. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units. CHANGHYUN YI is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. This examiner is responsible for all of the company's current pending workload.

The absence of a recorded technology area or art unit indicates a very narrow and centralized prosecution profile, with all active matters focused on the review of this one individual. A practitioner would need to focus exclusively on the requirements and examination style of CHANGHYUN YI. The lack of multiple pending actions or recorded art units means there are no other ongoing cases to provide a broader context for the company's strategy. Because this examiner's pending count matches the total number of 1 pending office action, the entire active portfolio is under the review of this single individual.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
YI, CHANGHYUN 1 94.0% +4.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18720608 A MEMORY DEVICE YI, CHANGHYUN —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18720608 A MEMORY DEVICE YI, CHANGHYUN — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 14, 2024

Managing Epinovatech AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month