Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Five AI Limited

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

16 pending office actions • 13 art units • 16 examiners • 0 of 16 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Five AI Limited currently manages 16 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This portfolio demonstrates a high degree of examiner diversification, as the pending actions are distributed among 16 distinct examiners. Such a direct ratio between actions and examiners suggests that prosecution strategies must be tailored to a wide variety of individual examiner preferences rather than a centralized departmental approach. The company must prepare for different sets of feedback, which requires significant internal coordination to maintain consistency across the portfolio.

The organizational breadth of the portfolio is further evidenced by its presence across 13 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's innovations intersect with numerous specialized examination groups within the patent office. Despite the overall volume of pending actions, there is no significant concentration of workload under any single official. The busiest examiner, LEE, BRANDON DONGPA, is responsible for only 1 pending office action. This figure matches the count assigned to every other examiner involved with the portfolio, ensuring that no single examiner's personal tendencies dominate the company's current legal landscape.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

16
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
9
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (44%)
9
Medium (56%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (6%)
§101 + other3 (19%)
§103 only9 (56%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (19%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
38% of docket
2
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
31% of docket
3
Business / Other
19% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

160 h
Manual time on pending OAs
32 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
56 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, BRANDON DONGPA 1 77.5% +23.8%
YANG, WEI WEN 1 81.9% +11.5%
CHANG, DANIEL CHEOLJIN 1 88.7% +13.6%
LIN, JESSICA YIFANG 1 81.8% -3.3%
WEISENFELD, ARYAN E 1 41.1% +25.5%
GONZALEZ, MARIO CARLOS 1 32.7% +6.1%
MELTON, TODD M 1 84.3% +17.8%
JEON, JAE UK 1 74.9% +45.2%
LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 1 6.1% +10.0%
BILODEAU, DUSTIN E 1 88.5% +8.5%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18998957 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED PERCEPTION OF 2D OR 3D SCENES YANG, WEI WEN —
18854181 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS LIN, JESSICA YIFANG —
18287370 3D PERCEPTION BILODEAU, DUSTIN E —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18562133 ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS ON PERCEPTION COMPONENTS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 46d overdue
18742965 DRIVING SCENARIOS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MELTON, TODD M 9d overdue
18008145 SIMULATION IN AUTONOMOUS DRIVING HOPKINS, DAVID ANDREW 27d
19156348 MAP ANNOTATION DATA GENERATION FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES LEE, BRANDON DONGPA —
18927754 PERCEPTION UNCERTAINTY CHANG, DANIEL CHEOLJIN —
18835462 TRAJECTORY GENERATION FOR MOBILE AGENTS WEISENFELD, ARYAN E —
18707057 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR MOBILE ROBOT TRAJECTORY PLANNERS JEON, JAE UK —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18562133 ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS ON PERCEPTION COMPONENTS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 46d overdue
18742965 DRIVING SCENARIOS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MELTON, TODD M 9d overdue
19156348 MAP ANNOTATION DATA GENERATION FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES LEE, BRANDON DONGPA —
18998957 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED PERCEPTION OF 2D OR 3D SCENES YANG, WEI WEN —
18927754 PERCEPTION UNCERTAINTY CHANG, DANIEL CHEOLJIN —
18835462 TRAJECTORY GENERATION FOR MOBILE AGENTS WEISENFELD, ARYAN E —
18707057 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR MOBILE ROBOT TRAJECTORY PLANNERS JEON, JAE UK —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3662 1
3663 1
3668 1
3669 1
2193 1
2496 1
2664 1
2673 1
3648 1
2100 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19156348 MAP ANNOTATION DATA GENERATION FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES LEE, BRANDON DONGPA 3662 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 13, 2025
18998957 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED PERCEPTION OF 2D OR 3D SCENES YANG, WEI WEN — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 27, 2025
18927754 PERCEPTION UNCERTAINTY CHANG, DANIEL CHEOLJIN — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18854181 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS LIN, JESSICA YIFANG — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2024
18835462 TRAJECTORY GENERATION FOR MOBILE AGENTS WEISENFELD, ARYAN E 3663 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 02, 2024
18835554 TRAJECTORY GENERATION FOR MOBILE AGENTS GONZALEZ, MARIO CARLOS 3668 §103 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Aug 02, 2024
18742965 DRIVING SCENARIOS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MELTON, TODD M 3669 §102§103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Jun 13, 2024
18707057 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR MOBILE ROBOT TRAJECTORY PLANNERS JEON, JAE UK 2193 §101 Final Rejection — Pending May 02, 2024
18562133 ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS ON PERCEPTION COMPONENTS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 2496 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Nov 17, 2023
18287370 3D PERCEPTION BILODEAU, DUSTIN E 2664 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2023
18272916 EXTRACTING FEATURES FROM SENSOR DATA CAI, PHUONG HAU 2673 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2023
18272773 RADAR PERCEPTION WOLFORD, NAOMI M 3648 §103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Jul 17, 2023
18011047 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS GONZALES, VINCENT 2100 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 16, 2022
18008140 GENERATING SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS FOR TESTING AV BEHAVIOUR MONTES, NARCISO EDUARDO 2189 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 02, 2022
18008145 SIMULATION IN AUTONOMOUS DRIVING HOPKINS, DAVID ANDREW 2188 §101§103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Dec 02, 2022
18008127 OPERATIONAL DESIGN DOMAINS IN AUTONOMOUS DRIVING JOHNSON, CEDRIC D 2186 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Dec 02, 2022

Managing Five AI Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month