Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

Five AI Limited

11 pending office actions • 10 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (55%)
5
Medium (45%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (9%)
§103 only5 (45%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (45%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
36% of docket
1
Communications
9% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
45% of docket
1
Business / Other
9% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, BRANDON DONGPA 1 77.5% +24.2%
LIN, JESSICA YIFANG 1 81.8% -3.3%
GONZALEZ, MARIO CARLOS 1 32.1% +5.3%
MELTON, TODD M 1 84.2% +17.9%
WANG, KAI NMN 1 55.3% +9.5%
BARHAM, RYAN ALLEN 1 56.3% +53.8%
LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 1 6.9% +11.1%
BERMAN, STEPHEN DAVID 1 78.4% +58.3%
WOLFORD, NAOMI M 1 56.0% +39.9%
GONZALES, VINCENT 1 78.4% +11.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18854181 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS LIN, JESSICA YIFANG

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274167 GENERATING SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS FOR TESTING AV BEHAVIOUR BERMAN, STEPHEN DAVID 73d overdue
18562133 ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS ON PERCEPTION COMPONENTS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 46d overdue
18742965 DRIVING SCENARIOS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MELTON, TODD M 9d overdue
18293246 PERCEPTION OF 3D OBJECTS IN SENSOR DATA BARHAM, RYAN ALLEN 9d overdue
18701143 ROAD SECTION PARTITIONING WANG, KAI NMN
18008140 GENERATING SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS FOR TESTING AV BEHAVIOUR MONTES, NARCISO EDUARDO

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274167 GENERATING SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS FOR TESTING AV BEHAVIOUR BERMAN, STEPHEN DAVID 73d overdue
18562133 ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS ON PERCEPTION COMPONENTS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 46d overdue
18742965 DRIVING SCENARIOS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MELTON, TODD M 9d overdue
18293246 PERCEPTION OF 3D OBJECTS IN SENSOR DATA BARHAM, RYAN ALLEN 9d overdue
18272773 RADAR PERCEPTION WOLFORD, NAOMI M 8d overdue
19156348 MAP ANNOTATION DATA GENERATION FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES LEE, BRANDON DONGPA
18011047 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS GONZALES, VINCENT

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3662 1
3668 1
3669 1
3664 1
2613 1
2496 1
2192 1
3648 1
2100 1
2189 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19156348 MAP ANNOTATION DATA GENERATION FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES LEE, BRANDON DONGPA 3662 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 13, 2025
18854181 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS LIN, JESSICA YIFANG §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 04, 2024
18835554 TRAJECTORY GENERATION FOR MOBILE AGENTS GONZALEZ, MARIO CARLOS 3668 §103 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Aug 02, 2024
18742965 DRIVING SCENARIOS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MELTON, TODD M 3669 §102§103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Jun 13, 2024
18701143 ROAD SECTION PARTITIONING WANG, KAI NMN 3664 §103§112 Final Rejection Pending Apr 12, 2024
18293246 PERCEPTION OF 3D OBJECTS IN SENSOR DATA BARHAM, RYAN ALLEN 2613 §102§103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Jan 29, 2024
18562133 ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS ON PERCEPTION COMPONENTS LOPEZ, MIGUEL ALEXANDER 2496 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Nov 17, 2023
18274167 GENERATING SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS FOR TESTING AV BEHAVIOUR BERMAN, STEPHEN DAVID 2192 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 73d overdue Pending Jul 25, 2023
18272773 RADAR PERCEPTION WOLFORD, NAOMI M 3648 §103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Jul 17, 2023
18011047 PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS GONZALES, VINCENT 2100 §103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 16, 2022
18008140 GENERATING SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS FOR TESTING AV BEHAVIOUR MONTES, NARCISO EDUARDO 2189 §101§102§103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 02, 2022

Managing Five AI Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month