Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WATTS III, JAMES MILLER | 1 | 73.9% | +15.5% |
| DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L | 1 | 85.3% | +5.5% |
| QURESHI, REHMAN AHMED | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| HOQUE, SHAHEDA SHABNAM | 1 | 44.1% | +35.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18000007 | GRIPPING DEVICE, ROBOT AND METHOD FOR SENSING FORCE INFORMATION | QURESHI, REHMAN AHMED | 5d overdue |
| 18272864 | HARMONIC DRIVE, METHOD OF MEASURING TORQUE IN HARMONIC DRIVE, AND ROBOT | DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L | 36d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18564414 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING EXTERNAL FORCE APPLIED TO ROBOTIC ARM, ROBOTIC ARM AND STORAGE MEDIUM | WATTS III, JAMES MILLER | 8d overdue |
| 17699360 | HAPTIC FEEDBACK SYSTEMS USING ONE OR MORE ROBOTIC ARMS | HOQUE, SHAHEDA SHABNAM | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3657 | 1 |
| 2855 | 1 |
| 3654 | 1 |
| 3658 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18564414 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING EXTERNAL FORCE APPLIED TO ROBOTIC ARM, ROBOTIC ARM AND STORAGE MEDIUM | WATTS III, JAMES MILLER | 3657 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Nov 27, 2023 |
| 18272864 | HARMONIC DRIVE, METHOD OF MEASURING TORQUE IN HARMONIC DRIVE, AND ROBOT | DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L | 2855 | §103 | Final Rejection | 36d | Pending | Jul 18, 2023 |
| 18000007 | GRIPPING DEVICE, ROBOT AND METHOD FOR SENSING FORCE INFORMATION | QURESHI, REHMAN AHMED | 3654 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Nov 28, 2022 |
| 17699360 | HAPTIC FEEDBACK SYSTEMS USING ONE OR MORE ROBOTIC ARMS | HOQUE, SHAHEDA SHABNAM | 3658 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Mar 21, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial