Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Frideco AG currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 pending actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, resulting in a balanced distribution of cases. The portfolio is active across 2 distinct art units, which indicates that each of the pending office actions is being reviewed within a different specialized technical group.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is PATEL, VISHAL A, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since each of the 2 distinct examiners is handling exactly 1 pending action, the workload is evenly split across the assigned personnel. This distribution ensures that no single examiner has a dominant role in the company's 2 pending office actions.
The fact that the pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct art units and multiple examiners suggests a fragmented prosecution environment. Each case is being handled by a different individual in a different technical unit, which may lead to varied examination experiences. Practitioners should prepare for the examiners to bring individual perspectives to the 2 pending actions, requiring a tailored approach for each matter within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATEL, VISHAL A | 1 | 59.0% | +22.5% |
| LEE, GEOFFREY S | 1 | 60.6% | +20.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17491369 | Pump System and Method for Operating a Pump System | LEE, GEOFFREY S | 12d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18854509 | END FACE MECHANICAL SEALING DEVICE, END FACE MECHANICAL SEAL, AND METHOD FOR MOUNTING AN END FACE MECHANICAL SEALING DEVICE | PATEL, VISHAL A | 2d overdue |
| 17491369 | Pump System and Method for Operating a Pump System | LEE, GEOFFREY S | 12d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3675 | 1 |
| 3746 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18854509 | END FACE MECHANICAL SEALING DEVICE, END FACE MECHANICAL SEAL, AND METHOD FOR MOUNTING AN END FACE MECHANICAL SEALING DEVICE | PATEL, VISHAL A | 3675 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Oct 04, 2024 |
| 17491369 | Pump System and Method for Operating a Pump System | LEE, GEOFFREY S | 3746 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Sep 30, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial