Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (60%) |
| No statute on record | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WU, TONG E | 2 | 69.9% | +16.4% |
| BAYS, PAMELA M | 1 | 72.2% | +36.9% |
| DINH, ANH-KHOA N | 1 | 86.9% | +14.5% |
| SCHLUETER, MARY GRACE | 1 | 80.0% | +33.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17974920 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DETERMINING QUALITY OF ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION SIGNAL | SCHLUETER, MARY GRACE | 42d overdue |
| 17979524 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPEDANCE COMPENSATION | DINH, ANH-KHOA N | 12d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17687186 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION DEVICE AND ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEM | WU, TONG E | 437d overdue |
| 17685725 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION DEVICE AND ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEM | WU, TONG E | 437d overdue |
| 17974920 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DETERMINING QUALITY OF ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION SIGNAL | SCHLUETER, MARY GRACE | 42d overdue |
| 18513000 | ANCHOR | BAYS, PAMELA M | 26d overdue |
| 17979524 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPEDANCE COMPENSATION | DINH, ANH-KHOA N | 12d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 5 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18513000 | ANCHOR | BAYS, PAMELA M | 3796 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 26d overdue | Pending | Nov 17, 2023 |
| 17979524 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPEDANCE COMPENSATION | DINH, ANH-KHOA N | 3796 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | Nov 02, 2022 |
| 17974920 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DETERMINING QUALITY OF ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION SIGNAL | SCHLUETER, MARY GRACE | 3796 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 42d overdue | Pending | Oct 27, 2022 |
| 17687186 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION DEVICE AND ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEM | WU, TONG E | 3796 | Other | Non-Final OA | 437d overdue | Pending | Mar 04, 2022 |
| 17685725 | ELECTRICAL STIMULATION DEVICE AND ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEM | WU, TONG E | 3796 | Other | Non-Final OA | 437d overdue | Pending | Mar 03, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial