Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days
Given Imaging Ltd. has 6 pending office actions currently active within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 6 distinct examiners, meaning that each pending matter is being handled by a different individual. This distribution requires the company to navigate 6 unique sets of examiner preferences and prosecution hurdles simultaneously.
The portfolio's 6 pending office actions are distributed across 5 distinct art units, showing that the company's work in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems is recognized across several different technical classifications at the patent office. ALAM, FAYYAZ is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since each of the 6 distinct examiners is responsible for exactly one action, the influence of the busiest examiner is no greater than any other individual involved. Practitioners must therefore develop 6 separate strategies to address the specific concerns of each examiner across the 5 involved art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (17%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (17%) |
| §103 only | 1 (17%) |
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
| §112 only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAM, FAYYAZ | 1 | 83.4% | +11.2% |
| CRAWFORD, JASON | 1 | 85.0% | +9.1% |
| TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL | 1 | 47.9% | +22.2% |
| CHOU, WILLIAM B | 1 | 72.6% | +20.6% |
| LONG, FONYA M | 1 | 3.4% | +0.8% |
| LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P | 1 | 34.5% | +39.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18853583 | LASER DIRECT STRUCTURING ANTENNA ASSEMBLY FOR IN-VIVO DEVICES | CRAWFORD, JASON | 12d |
| 19010686 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, APPS, AND METHODS FOR CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY PROCEDURES | ALAM, FAYYAZ | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17600186 | IN VIVO IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEM | LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P | 18d overdue |
| 18561587 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING GASTROINTESTINAL CLEANSING | TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL | 8d |
| 18278986 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IN-VIVO INSPECTION | LONG, FONYA M | 9d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17600186 | IN VIVO IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEM | LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P | 18d overdue |
| 18561587 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING GASTROINTESTINAL CLEANSING | TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL | 8d |
| 19010686 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, APPS, AND METHODS FOR CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY PROCEDURES | ALAM, FAYYAZ | — |
| 18496253 | IMAGE INPAINTING OF IN-VIVO IMAGES | CHOU, WILLIAM B | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2844 | 1 |
| 3681 | 1 |
| 3795 | 1 |
| 3682 | 1 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19010686 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, APPS, AND METHODS FOR CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY PROCEDURES | ALAM, FAYYAZ | — | §112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 06, 2025 |
| 18853583 | LASER DIRECT STRUCTURING ANTENNA ASSEMBLY FOR IN-VIVO DEVICES | CRAWFORD, JASON | 2844 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | Oct 02, 2024 |
| 18561587 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING GASTROINTESTINAL CLEANSING | TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL | 3681 | §101 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Nov 16, 2023 |
| 18496253 | IMAGE INPAINTING OF IN-VIVO IMAGES | CHOU, WILLIAM B | 3795 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 27, 2023 |
| 18278986 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IN-VIVO INSPECTION | LONG, FONYA M | 3682 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Aug 25, 2023 |
| 17600186 | IN VIVO IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEM | LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P | 3791 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 18d overdue | Pending | Sep 30, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial