Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Given Imaging Ltd.

6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (17%)
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only1 (17%)
Double-patenting only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CRAWFORD, JASON 1 85.0% +8.9%
ALAM, FAYYAZ 1 83.4% +11.2%
TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL 1 48.0% +22.6%
WRIGHT, KRYSTEN NIKOLE 1 0.0% +0.0%
BAVA, JANKI MAHESH 1 12.5% +66.7%
LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P 1 34.2% +39.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18853583 LASER DIRECT STRUCTURING ANTENNA ASSEMBLY FOR IN-VIVO DEVICES CRAWFORD, JASON 12d
18798928 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND DISPLAYING A STUDY OF A STREAM OF IN-VIVO IMAGES ALAM, FAYYAZ

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17917021 ADHESION DETECTION FOR A MEDICAL PATCH BAVA, JANKI MAHESH 60d overdue
17600186 IN VIVO IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEM LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P 18d overdue
18561587 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING GASTROINTESTINAL CLEANSING TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL 8d
18278986 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IN-VIVO INSPECTION WRIGHT, KRYSTEN NIKOLE 9d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17917021 ADHESION DETECTION FOR A MEDICAL PATCH BAVA, JANKI MAHESH 60d overdue
17600186 IN VIVO IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEM LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P 18d overdue
18561587 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING GASTROINTESTINAL CLEANSING TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL 8d
18798928 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND DISPLAYING A STUDY OF A STREAM OF IN-VIVO IMAGES ALAM, FAYYAZ

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2
2844 1
3681 1
3682 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18853583 LASER DIRECT STRUCTURING ANTENNA ASSEMBLY FOR IN-VIVO DEVICES CRAWFORD, JASON 2844 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Oct 02, 2024
18798928 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND DISPLAYING A STUDY OF A STREAM OF IN-VIVO IMAGES ALAM, FAYYAZ DP Non-Final OA Pending Aug 09, 2024
18561587 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING GASTROINTESTINAL CLEANSING TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL 3681 §101 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Nov 16, 2023
18278986 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IN-VIVO INSPECTION WRIGHT, KRYSTEN NIKOLE 3682 §101§103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Aug 25, 2023
17917021 ADHESION DETECTION FOR A MEDICAL PATCH BAVA, JANKI MAHESH 3791 §103§112 Final Rejection 60d overdue Pending Oct 05, 2022
17600186 IN VIVO IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEM LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P 3791 §102§103 Non-Final OA 18d overdue Pending Sep 30, 2021

Managing Given Imaging Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month