Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hach Lange GmbH

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Hach Lange GmbH manages a patent portfolio in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area with 6 pending office actions. These actions are spread across 6 distinct examiners, indicating a high level of individual review for each application. The prosecution activity is distributed among 4 distinct art units, which shows that the company's optics and circuit innovations are being examined by multiple specialized groups. The presence of 4 distinct art units within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field indicates that Hach Lange GmbH's technology spans several different technical sub-specialties.

PEREZ-GUZMAN, CARLOS GABRIEL is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Given that there are 6 pending actions and 6 distinct examiners, the workload is perfectly distributed, with each examiner handling exactly 1 action. This suggests that no single examiner has a dominant role in the company's overall pending portfolio. Practitioners must manage 6 different examiner relationships across 4 different units. This level of distribution requires a comprehensive prosecution strategy that accounts for the various practices and interpretations of many different patent office officials.

The 6 to 6 ratio of pending actions to examiners ensures that each application is being handled by a different individual. This distribution provides a variety of examiner perspectives on the company's intellectual property. The involvement of 4 distinct art units adds another layer of complexity, as each unit may have its own internal guidelines and examination culture. This profile represents a highly decentralized prosecution environment for the company's current intellectual property assets, requiring careful coordination across many different points of contact at the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (33%)
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
50% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PEREZ-GUZMAN, CARLOS GABRIEL 1 81.9% +24.0%
FITZSIMMONS, ALLISON G 1 47.9% +16.1%
KASS, BENJAMIN JOSEPH 1 32.6% +58.9%
TRAN, JUDY DAO 1 78.6% +19.5%
FAYE, MAMADOU 1 78.8% +6.5%
MCGUIRK, JOHN SCHUYLER 1 78.0% +48.4%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18845649 PHOTOMETRIC PROCESS MEASUREMENT APPARATUS PEREZ-GUZMAN, CARLOS GABRIEL 43d
18708963 A METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SAMPLE FILTER CLOGGING CONDITION VALUE FITZSIMMONS, ALLISON G —
18699039 ANALYSIS PREPARATION CUVETTE RACK UNIT KASS, BENJAMIN JOSEPH —
18258999 METHOD FOR VERIFYING THE PLAUSIBILITY OF SENSOR INFORMATION IN A PLANT PROCESS MCGUIRK, JOHN SCHUYLER —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18292709 CUVETTE FOR A PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF A SAMPLE, METHOD FOR A PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF A SAMPLE, SYSTEM FOR A PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A SAMPLE AND METHOD FOR A PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A SAMPLE TRAN, JUDY DAO 22d overdue
18845649 PHOTOMETRIC PROCESS MEASUREMENT APPARATUS PEREZ-GUZMAN, CARLOS GABRIEL 43d
18708963 A METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SAMPLE FILTER CLOGGING CONDITION VALUE FITZSIMMONS, ALLISON G —
18699039 ANALYSIS PREPARATION CUVETTE RACK UNIT KASS, BENJAMIN JOSEPH —
18258999 METHOD FOR VERIFYING THE PLAUSIBILITY OF SENSOR INFORMATION IN A PLANT PROCESS MCGUIRK, JOHN SCHUYLER —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2877 2
1773 1
2884 1
1798 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18845649 PHOTOMETRIC PROCESS MEASUREMENT APPARATUS PEREZ-GUZMAN, CARLOS GABRIEL 2877 §103§112 Final Rejection 43d Pending Sep 10, 2024
18708963 A METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SAMPLE FILTER CLOGGING CONDITION VALUE FITZSIMMONS, ALLISON G 1773 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2024
18699039 ANALYSIS PREPARATION CUVETTE RACK UNIT KASS, BENJAMIN JOSEPH — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 05, 2024
18292709 CUVETTE FOR A PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF A SAMPLE, METHOD FOR A PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF A SAMPLE, SYSTEM FOR A PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A SAMPLE AND METHOD FOR A PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A SAMPLE TRAN, JUDY DAO 2877 §112 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2024
18258992 MULTI-WAVELENGTH PROCESS PHOTOMETER FAYE, MAMADOU 2884 §103 Final Rejection 1d overdue Pending Jun 22, 2023
18258999 METHOD FOR VERIFYING THE PLAUSIBILITY OF SENSOR INFORMATION IN A PLANT PROCESS MCGUIRK, JOHN SCHUYLER 1798 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 22, 2023

Managing Hach Lange GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month