Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Examiner: FITZSIMMONS, ALLISON G

Tech Center 1700 • Art Units: 1773 1777 1778 1797

This examiner grants 48% of resolved cases

Analysis

Allison G. Fitzsimmons is a patent examiner in Tech Center 1700 and Art Unit 1773. She has reached a resolution in 620 cases. The data shows an allowance rate of 47.9 percent for these applications. This percentage indicates that slightly fewer than half of the cases assigned to her result in a patent grant. Practitioners can use this 47.9 percent rate to understand the balanced but rigorous examination environment presented by this examiner.

The impact of interviews on prosecution outcomes is shown by an interview lift of 16.1 percent. This metric suggests that direct communication with the examiner provides a meaningful increase in the probability of allowance. An interview lift of 16.1 percent indicates that verbal negotiation is a productive strategy for addressing rejections and moving an application toward a grant. Practitioners should consider scheduling an interview to improve their chances of success in this art unit.

The median days to allowance for successful cases is 1291. This duration represents the middle value of the time taken from filing to the issuance of a patent. A median of 1291 days provides a specific timeline for applicants to consider when managing their expectations for the prosecution process. These metrics are based on 620 resolved cases, offering a data-grounded perspective on the examiner's historical prosecution patterns.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

47.9%
Allow Rate
-17.1% vs TC avg
653
Total Applications
+16.1%
Interview Lift
1291
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 620 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.7%
§101 Eligibility
18.1%
§102 Novelty
49.7%
§103 Obviousness
28.7%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18048608 PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT FOR DIRECT INJECTION USING MECHANICALLY ASSISTED FORWARD OSMOSIS Non-Final OA Saudi Arabian Oil Company
18008749 METHOD FOR SEPARATING BIOMASS FROM A SOLUTION COMPRISING BIOMASS AND AT LEAST ONE AROMA COMPOUND Non-Final OA BASF SE
18319118 FILTRATION DEVICE, FILTRATION SYSTEM, AND FILTRATION METHOD Final Rejection Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
18622001 ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION OF FILTRATION MEDIA Non-Final OA Donaldson Company, Inc.
18572640 ACCUMULATOR Final Rejection FUJIKOKI CORPORATION
18079745 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FILTER WITH IMPROVED FLUSHING Non-Final OA ENTEGRIS, INC.
18081993 Nonwoven Fabrics Including Recycled Polyester Non-Final OA Berry Global, Inc.
18137195 DEVICE FOR TANGENTIAL FLOW FILTRATION OF A FLUID Final Rejection Levitronix GmbH
18037575 FILTER Final Rejection MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FÖRDERUNG DER WISSENSCHAFTEN E.V.
18431305 TRAINED NEURAL NETWORK MODEL TO DETERMINE CARTRIDGE AND SYSTEM HEALTH Non-Final OA Thermo Finnigan LLC

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month