Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (33%) |
| §102 only | 3 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAVIS, CASSANDRA HOPE | 2 | 59.4% | +25.8% |
| WEEKS, GLORIA R | 1 | 70.3% | +12.3% |
| PAGAN, JAVIER A | 1 | 68.9% | +24.5% |
| LETT, THOMAS J | 1 | 83.8% | -35.4% |
| TAWFIK, SAMEH | 1 | 63.0% | +31.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18621899 | AUGMENTED REALITY CAPTURE OF CUSTOMIZED CONTENT FOR PRINT-ON-DEMAND PRODUCTS | LETT, THOMAS J | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18960425 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED PLACEMENT OF HANG TABS ON GIFT BAGS AND OTHER ITEMS | WEEKS, GLORIA R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18635127 | DRINKWARE WITH ICON ATTACHMENT | PAGAN, JAVIER A | 5d overdue |
| 18765851 | POCKET CARD | DAVIS, CASSANDRA HOPE | 3d overdue |
| 17834819 | GREETING CARD FOR AUTOMATED PRINTING | TAWFIK, SAMEH | 3d overdue |
| 18960425 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED PLACEMENT OF HANG TABS ON GIFT BAGS AND OTHER ITEMS | WEEKS, GLORIA R | — |
| 18655804 | CARD FOR RETAINING INSERT SHEET | DAVIS, CASSANDRA HOPE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3731 | 2 |
| 3631 | 2 |
| 3735 | 1 |
| 2611 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18960425 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED PLACEMENT OF HANG TABS ON GIFT BAGS AND OTHER ITEMS | WEEKS, GLORIA R | 3731 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 26, 2024 |
| 18765851 | POCKET CARD | DAVIS, CASSANDRA HOPE | 3631 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 3d overdue | Pending | Jul 08, 2024 |
| 18655804 | CARD FOR RETAINING INSERT SHEET | DAVIS, CASSANDRA HOPE | 3631 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 06, 2024 |
| 18635127 | DRINKWARE WITH ICON ATTACHMENT | PAGAN, JAVIER A | 3735 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Apr 15, 2024 |
| 18621899 | AUGMENTED REALITY CAPTURE OF CUSTOMIZED CONTENT FOR PRINT-ON-DEMAND PRODUCTS | LETT, THOMAS J | 2611 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 17834819 | GREETING CARD FOR AUTOMATED PRINTING | TAWFIK, SAMEH | 3731 | §102 | Final Rejection | 3d overdue | Pending | Jun 07, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial