Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Harness Inc. has 4 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are spread across 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, indicating that the company's prosecution efforts are not concentrated under a single individual or unit.
RIVERA, ANIBAL is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. Given that there are multiple pending office actions and distinct examiners, the workload is distributed so that this examiner handles 1 pending action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (25%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RIVERA, ANIBAL | 1 | 90.9% | +11.9% |
| TAYLOR, SAKINAH W | 1 | 86.7% | +23.2% |
| AGUILERA, TODD | 1 | 57.6% | +57.6% |
| HAN, JOSEP | 1 | 45.8% | -0.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17348785 | MULTI-API METRIC MODELING USING LSTM SYSTEM | HAN, JOSEP | 29d |
| 18786157 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TESTING OF USER INTERFACES IN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | RIVERA, ANIBAL | — |
| 18419593 | GENERALIZED BEHAVIOR ANALYTICS FRAMEWORK FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF API SECURITY VULNERABILITIES | TAYLOR, SAKINAH W | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17545577 | REDUCING TIME TO TEST CYCLE FIRST FAIL | AGUILERA, TODD | 56d |
| 18786157 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TESTING OF USER INTERFACES IN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | RIVERA, ANIBAL | — |
| 18419593 | GENERALIZED BEHAVIOR ANALYTICS FRAMEWORK FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF API SECURITY VULNERABILITIES | TAYLOR, SAKINAH W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2407 | 1 |
| 2192 | 1 |
| 2122 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18786157 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TESTING OF USER INTERFACES IN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | RIVERA, ANIBAL | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 26, 2024 |
| 18419593 | GENERALIZED BEHAVIOR ANALYTICS FRAMEWORK FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF API SECURITY VULNERABILITIES | TAYLOR, SAKINAH W | 2407 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 23, 2024 |
| 17545577 | REDUCING TIME TO TEST CYCLE FIRST FAIL | AGUILERA, TODD | 2192 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | Dec 08, 2021 |
| 17348785 | MULTI-API METRIC MODELING USING LSTM SYSTEM | HAN, JOSEP | 2122 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 29d | Pending | Jun 16, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial