Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

Harness Inc.

7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (29%)
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only3 (43%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
86% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RIVERA, ANIBAL 1 90.9% +12.0%
TAYLOR, SAKINAH W 1 86.5% +23.6%
UNG, LANNY N 1 71.2% +25.7%
DAILEY, THOMAS J 1 80.9% +15.0%
AGUILERA, TODD 1 57.4% +57.3%
HAN, JOSEP 1 36.8% +6.7%
LE, MICHAEL 1 65.7% +22.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18227515 CONTINUOUS API-BASED FRAUD DETECTION USING SEQUENCES DAILEY, THOMAS J

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17348785 MULTI-API METRIC MODELING USING LSTM SYSTEM HAN, JOSEP 29d
18786157 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TESTING OF USER INTERFACES IN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS RIVERA, ANIBAL
18419593 GENERALIZED BEHAVIOR ANALYTICS FRAMEWORK FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF API SECURITY VULNERABILITIES TAYLOR, SAKINAH W
18419314 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING EVENT ATTRIBUTION IN SOFTWARE APPLICATION UNG, LANNY N

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17545577 REDUCING TIME TO TEST CYCLE FIRST FAIL AGUILERA, TODD 56d
18786157 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TESTING OF USER INTERFACES IN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS RIVERA, ANIBAL
18419593 GENERALIZED BEHAVIOR ANALYTICS FRAMEWORK FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF API SECURITY VULNERABILITIES TAYLOR, SAKINAH W
18419314 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING EVENT ATTRIBUTION IN SOFTWARE APPLICATION UNG, LANNY N
18227515 CONTINUOUS API-BASED FRAUD DETECTION USING SEQUENCES DAILEY, THOMAS J
17339946 INTELLIGENT NAMING OF APPLICATION PROGRAM INTERFACES LE, MICHAEL

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2407 1
2197 1
2458 1
2192 1
2122 1
2163 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18786157 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TESTING OF USER INTERFACES IN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS RIVERA, ANIBAL §101§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 26, 2024
18419593 GENERALIZED BEHAVIOR ANALYTICS FRAMEWORK FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF API SECURITY VULNERABILITIES TAYLOR, SAKINAH W 2407 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Jan 23, 2024
18419314 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING EVENT ATTRIBUTION IN SOFTWARE APPLICATION UNG, LANNY N 2197 §101 Final Rejection Pending Jan 22, 2024
18227515 CONTINUOUS API-BASED FRAUD DETECTION USING SEQUENCES DAILEY, THOMAS J 2458 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jul 28, 2023
17545577 REDUCING TIME TO TEST CYCLE FIRST FAIL AGUILERA, TODD 2192 §103 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Dec 08, 2021
17348785 MULTI-API METRIC MODELING USING LSTM SYSTEM HAN, JOSEP 2122 §101 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Jun 16, 2021
17339946 INTELLIGENT NAMING OF APPLICATION PROGRAM INTERFACES LE, MICHAEL 2163 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jun 05, 2021

Managing Harness Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month