Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Harness Inc.

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (67%)
§103 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
UNG, LANNY N 1 71.3% +25.4%
AGUILERA, TODD 1 57.1% +57.1%
HAN, JOSEP 1 37.5% +25.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17348785 MULTI-API METRIC MODELING USING LSTM SYSTEM HAN, JOSEP 29d
18419314 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING EVENT ATTRIBUTION IN SOFTWARE APPLICATION UNG, LANNY N

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17348785 MULTI-API METRIC MODELING USING LSTM SYSTEM HAN, JOSEP 29d
17545577 REDUCING TIME TO TEST CYCLE FIRST FAIL AGUILERA, TODD 56d
18419314 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING EVENT ATTRIBUTION IN SOFTWARE APPLICATION UNG, LANNY N

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2197 1
2192 1
2122 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18419314 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING EVENT ATTRIBUTION IN SOFTWARE APPLICATION UNG, LANNY N 2197 §101 Final Rejection Pending Jan 22, 2024
17545577 REDUCING TIME TO TEST CYCLE FIRST FAIL AGUILERA, TODD 2192 §103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Dec 08, 2021
17348785 MULTI-API METRIC MODELING USING LSTM SYSTEM HAN, JOSEP 2122 §101 Final Rejection 29d Pending Jun 16, 2021

Managing Harness Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month