Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. is currently managing 7 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are distributed across 7 distinct examiners, indicating that each examiner is handling exactly a single case for the company. This broad distribution suggests that the company's prosecution results are not dependent on the discretion of any single individual.

The portfolio is spread across 6 distinct art units, which reflects a diverse range of technical focuses within the pharmaceutical sector. MARK V STEVENS is identified as the busiest examiner, although he is responsible for only 1 busiest examiner pending action. This confirms that the workload is evenly dispersed across the distinct examiners currently assigned to the company's files.

For practitioners, the fact that pending office actions are spread across 6 distinct art units implies that the applicant must manage a variety of examination cultures and standards. The high ratio of art units to pending actions suggests that the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals inventions being pursued are technically varied. This decentralized prosecution environment requires a flexible strategy to address the different requirements of each art unit and examiner involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
6
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (67%)
Double-patenting + other2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STEVENS, MARK V 1 65.5% +41.6%
CHI, AMANDA LYNN 1 — —
MALATEK, KATHERYN A 1 86.7% +43.0%
KUMAR, RAKESH 1 57.2% +28.2%
SOROUSH, LAYLA 1 40.5% +43.4%
NGUYEN, NGOC-ANH THI 1 28.1% +49.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18292103 MICRONEEDLE PATCH MALATEK, KATHERYN A —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17433289 TRANSDERMAL PATCH NGUYEN, NGOC-ANH THI —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18270760 PACKAGING BAG AND PATCH PACKAGING PRODUCT KUMAR, RAKESH 14d
18941163 PATCH STEVENS, MARK V —
18292103 MICRONEEDLE PATCH MALATEK, KATHERYN A —
17796921 DICLOFENAC SODIUM CONTAINING PATCH SOROUSH, LAYLA —
17433289 TRANSDERMAL PATCH NGUYEN, NGOC-ANH THI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1613 1
3741 1
3651 1
1622 1
1615 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18941163 PATCH STEVENS, MARK V — §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18705656 ADHESIVE PATCH WITH COVER MATERIAL CHI, AMANDA LYNN 1613 §103 Final Rejection 16d Pending Apr 29, 2024
18292103 MICRONEEDLE PATCH MALATEK, KATHERYN A 3741 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 25, 2024
18270760 PACKAGING BAG AND PATCH PACKAGING PRODUCT KUMAR, RAKESH 3651 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jul 03, 2023
17796921 DICLOFENAC SODIUM CONTAINING PATCH SOROUSH, LAYLA 1622 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 02, 2022
17433289 TRANSDERMAL PATCH NGUYEN, NGOC-ANH THI 1615 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 24, 2021

Managing Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month