Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute Company Limited

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 32 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The patent portfolio for Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute Company Limited shows 4 pending office actions. These actions are situated within the Computing & Software technology area. The prosecution is notably decentralized, as there are 4 distinct examiners assigned to the 4 pending office actions. This variety suggests that the company is engaging with a broad range of examiner perspectives across its current applications.

Further evidence of this diversification is found in the 4 distinct art units involved in the process. With 4 distinct examiners spread across 4 distinct art units, the applicant faces a wide array of procedural environments. The busiest examiner, ZERON CERRATO, JOSEPH NATANAEL, is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. This indicates that no single examiner is overwhelmed by the portfolio, as the 4 pending office actions are distributed across the 4 distinct examiners.

For the practitioner, this Computing & Software portfolio requires managing multiple examiner perspectives. Because the 4 distinct art units may have different internal norms, the 4 distinct examiners will likely produce varied rejections. The presence of ZERON CERRATO, JOSEPH NATANAEL with only 1 busiest examiner pending action confirms that the workload is not concentrated. This distribution allows for a broader assessment of how the office views the company's Computing & Software innovations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZERON CERRATO, JOSEPH NATANAEL 1 — —
AGRAWAL, SHISHIR 1 8.3% +15.4%
PELTON, NATHANIEL R 1 74.5% +19.0%
RICHTER, KARA MARIE 1 54.5% +32.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179398 METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING WORKFLOW-BASED NEURAL NETWORK INCLUDING ATTENTION LAYER AGRAWAL, SHISHIR 72d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179398 METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING WORKFLOW-BASED NEURAL NETWORK INCLUDING ATTENTION LAYER AGRAWAL, SHISHIR 72d
18089878 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ON-SITE DETERMINATION OF CHARGING CURRENT FOR A BATTERY PELTON, NATHANIEL R —
17898956 Systems and Methods for Time of Flight Measurement Implementing Threshold-Based Sampling for Waveform Digitizing RICHTER, KARA MARIE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
4100 1
2123 1
2859 1
3645 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18518621 LIDAR APPARATUS ZERON CERRATO, JOSEPH NATANAEL 4100 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 24, 2023
18179398 METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING WORKFLOW-BASED NEURAL NETWORK INCLUDING ATTENTION LAYER AGRAWAL, SHISHIR 2123 §103§112 Final Rejection 72d Pending Mar 07, 2023
18089878 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ON-SITE DETERMINATION OF CHARGING CURRENT FOR A BATTERY PELTON, NATHANIEL R 2859 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 28, 2022
17898956 Systems and Methods for Time of Flight Measurement Implementing Threshold-Based Sampling for Waveform Digitizing RICHTER, KARA MARIE 3645 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 30, 2022

Managing Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute Company Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month